2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of dam construction to contain the invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in a Mediterranean mountain stream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potentially positive role played by barriers has been suggested by other studies on crayfish conservation (Gil-Sanchez & Alba-Tercedor, 2006;Manenti et al, 2014). At the same time, the removal of barriers to allow fish recolonisation may favour upstream movements of invasive crayfish (Dana et al, 2011), and returning fish may also spread crayfish plague and other diseases (Oidtmann, 2012). Our results challenge the idea that hydrological habitat connectivity always has positive effects on native biodiversity.…”
Section: The Challenging Role Of Freshwater Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The potentially positive role played by barriers has been suggested by other studies on crayfish conservation (Gil-Sanchez & Alba-Tercedor, 2006;Manenti et al, 2014). At the same time, the removal of barriers to allow fish recolonisation may favour upstream movements of invasive crayfish (Dana et al, 2011), and returning fish may also spread crayfish plague and other diseases (Oidtmann, 2012). Our results challenge the idea that hydrological habitat connectivity always has positive effects on native biodiversity.…”
Section: The Challenging Role Of Freshwater Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…natural or artificial vertical falls >1 m that invasive crayfish cannot climb over (Dana, Garcia-De-Lomas, Gonzalez, & Ortega, 2011)], piped stretches (artificial subterranean stretches >10 m, which are generally unsuitable for crayfish) and polluted stretches (the presence of very abundant periphyton indicating high organic pollution) (Maitland, 1990;Moss, 1998). natural or artificial vertical falls >1 m that invasive crayfish cannot climb over (Dana, Garcia-De-Lomas, Gonzalez, & Ortega, 2011)], piped stretches (artificial subterranean stretches >10 m, which are generally unsuitable for crayfish) and polluted stretches (the presence of very abundant periphyton indicating high organic pollution) (Maitland, 1990;Moss, 1998).…”
Section: Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, structures that may act as barriers to movement through alteration of habitat or by creating physically impassable barriers are expected to contribute to the fragmentation of populations. The majority of studies that relate crayfish distribution and movement to river impoundments such as culverts have focused primarily on the potential of culverts and weirs to limit the geographical spread of introduced species of crayfish (Light, 2003;Kerby et al, 2005;Dana et al, 2011;Foster and Keller, 2011;Frings et al, 2013;Maceda-Veiga et al, 2013), thus further highlighting the potential ability of these structures to negatively impact native species of crayfish. Culverts can restrict movement and limit dispersal of crayfish, as well as other aquatic animals by causing the elevation of water velocity, increasing channel homogeneity and alteration of river bed structure, or creating direct barriers through the positioning of elevated culvert outlets and mini weirs (Bubb et al, 2008;Souty-Grosset and Reynolds, 2009;Franklin and Bartels, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%