2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.04.29.22274454
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529): A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression

Abstract: Background: There is a need for evaluation regarding vaccine effectiveness (VE) and the urgency of booster vaccination against Covid-19 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant. Methods: Systematic search was conducted on April 6th, 2022, on databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus). VE difference (VED) estimates were assessed using random-effects model and DerSimonian-Laird tau estimators. Two models result, i.e., within 3 months and within 3 months or more, are compared. VE versus time meta-regr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Data for boosters were obtained from a test-negative case-control study conducted in England, with assumptions applied for missing data. 15 For the Omicron BA.1 period, initial VE for primary series and booster and waning for the primary series were obtained from a meta-analysis by Pratama et al, 2022; 16 data collected in England 17 were used where meta-analytic data were unavailable. The waning rates for the booster were assumed to be the same as the waning rates for the primary series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Data for boosters were obtained from a test-negative case-control study conducted in England, with assumptions applied for missing data. 15 For the Omicron BA.1 period, initial VE for primary series and booster and waning for the primary series were obtained from a meta-analysis by Pratama et al, 2022; 16 data collected in England 17 were used where meta-analytic data were unavailable. The waning rates for the booster were assumed to be the same as the waning rates for the primary series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary series VE for all vaccines against infection and monthly waning for mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 were obtained from a meta-analysis conducted by Pratama et al, 2022. 15 Pratama identified studies available by April 6, 2022, including 12 from the US, 4 from Europe, 2 from South Africa, 2 from Qatar and 1 from Canada. Monthly waning for Ad26.COV2.S and ChAdOX1-S were calculated from a large study by Adams et al, 2022 in the US, 16 and the UK Health Security Agency (HSA) COVID-19 report, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Booster VE against hospitalization for BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S were obtained from Pratama et al, 2022. 15 Similar to booster VE against infection, the HR from Hulme et al, 2022 4 for hospitalizations was applied the BNT162b2 booster hospitalization VE to obtain the VE of mRNA-1273. Data for ChAdOx1-S were unavailable from the Pratama meta-analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations