2013
DOI: 10.2298/zipi1302422z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of computer-assisted learning in biology teaching in primary schools in Serbia

Abstract: The paper analyzes the comparative effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Learning (CAL) and the traditional teaching method in biology on primary school pupils. A stratified random sample consisted of 214 pupils from two primary schools in Novi Sad. The pupils in the experimental group learned the biology content (Chordate) using CAL, whereas the pupils in the control group learned the same content using traditional teaching. The research design was the pretest-posttest equivalent groups design.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
2
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such results of work are in accordance with the results of research done by authors who deal with similar issues (Çepni, Tas & Köse, 2006;Cekić-Jovanović, Golubović-Ilić & Jakovljević, 2014;Chaudhari, 2013;Hulya Efe & Rifat Efe, 2011;Serin, 2011;Soleša, 2000;Stanković, 2009;Yusuf & Afolabi 2010;Županec, Miljanović & Pribićević, 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Such results of work are in accordance with the results of research done by authors who deal with similar issues (Çepni, Tas & Köse, 2006;Cekić-Jovanović, Golubović-Ilić & Jakovljević, 2014;Chaudhari, 2013;Hulya Efe & Rifat Efe, 2011;Serin, 2011;Soleša, 2000;Stanković, 2009;Yusuf & Afolabi 2010;Županec, Miljanović & Pribićević, 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Despite the reported contribution of computerized learning settings to learning in general and literacy in specific, we found no modulating effect for the learning setting on performance, as reflected by the lack of difference between the computerized and pen-and-pencil groups in academic vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension (e.g., Bayraktar, 2001;De Witte & Rogge, 2014;Mo et al, 2014;Shannon, Styers, Wilkerson, & Peery, 2015;Županec, Miljanović, & Pribićević, 2013). The absence of any additive beneficial effect for computer-assisted over pen-and-pencil learning settings might be attributed to agerelated modulations, with the majority of studies reviewed previously, addressing younger pupils.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…A pesar de la contribución que se le atribuye al aprendizaje asistido por ordenador en general y a la alfabetización en particular, no se observó ningún efecto significativo del contexto de aprendizaje en el rendimiento de los participantes, como refleja la ausencia de diferencias entre ambos grupos de intervención en las tareas de conocimiento del vocabulario académico y de comprensión lectora (e.g., Bayraktar, 2001; De Witte & Rogge, 2014; Mo et al, 2014; Shannon, Styers, Wilkerson, & Peery, 2015; Županec, Miljanović, & Pribićević, 2013). La ausencia de cualquier efecto positivo del contexto de aprendizaje asistido por ordenador frente al uso de materiales impresos podría atribuirse a otros efectos relacionados con la edad, puesto que la mayoría de los estudios revisados están dirigidos a estudiantes de menor edad.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The integration of ICT into the teaching and learning process is a challenge for both teachers and students at all levels of education. Under the influence of ICT, new learning models are being developed in order to improve the quality of teaching approach and learning outcomes (Županec, Miljanović, & Pribićević, 2013). The increasing popularity of ICT, the time which students spend in front of the computer, and the ease of accepting technological innovations in students, impose a need for technology integration in a meaningful way in different subject areas already across the primary school curriculum (Costa et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%