Effectiveness of community based-collaborative on forest management of the forest programme III in Central Sulawesi

Abstract

Indonesia is moving quickly to ratify the Paris Agreement as stipulated in Constitution Number 16/2016 as a total commitment and contribution to reducing global carbon emissions. For this action, Indonesia received a cooperation grant, one of which was the Forest Programme (FP) III Sulawesi. FP III aims to contribute to implementing forest conservation and rehabilitation strategies, as a form of adaptation and mitigation of climate change, through support for improving the livelihoods of the rural poor. This program was conducted with multi-stakeholder management in the Lore Lindu landscape. This study attempted to examine the effectiveness of the project on collaborative community-based forest management with an explanatory approach. The results showed that interconnectivity between programs in each PIU had not gone optimally. Although the village facilitators have carried out their job, the indicator results have not followed the community’s needs. In addition, the role of FMUs as the holder of the regional authority at the site level has not been directly involved. It has strategic value for the national interest, ensuring that the forest and land rehabilitation program’s implementation will be in the right location on the target because FMUs have detailed data and information at the field level.

The perspective of multi-parties to the implementation of Forestry and Other Land Use (FoLU) net sink in Central Sulawesi

“…Those with intimate contact with the forest bear a significant deal of responsibility for preserving the natural balance and ensuring forest sustainability [17,35,40]. As a result, they are linked as part of a socio-ecological system [41,42].…”

“…Even though it has not been managed optimally, the initiative and commitment of area managers can already be seen. Many factors contribute to an optimal running program, including human resource capacity [34,35], budget capabilities [36,37], and the level of participation in running it [17,38]. Sustainable and just forest management can be achieved by aligning the interests of stakeholders so that the parties agree to collaborate R Responsibilities There is legal certainty (policy) in implementing the program, and the need for understanding and commitment from stakeholders, supported by solid and participatory institutional capacity…”

“…Therefore, has a lot of article publications reviewed it. From an aspect spatial [11][12][13]; socio-economic [14][15][16][17]; forestry policy [18][19][20]; carbon calculation and or estimation [4,21,22]; local community-based mitigation and adaptation [17,[23][24][25].…”

Deforestation as a catalyst for natural disaster and community suffering: A cycle in the socioecological system

“…Unbalanced infiltration capacity and soil percolation in forested regions are responsible for the accumulation of huge water discharges (Chen J. et al 2021;Hasyim et al 2021). Climate change is one of the most threatening and risky factors that impact human life, especially those living around forest areas today (Dyderski et al 2018;Golar et al 2022;Qu et al 2018). In the last 5 years, human involvement (anthropogenic) in accelerating forest destruction has been very prominent in Indonesia (Feng et al 2021).…”

“…The suffering felt by the affected communities is difficult to describe, but can only be felt, not only because of the loss of property and agricultural land but also due to the loss of enthusiasm for life after dealing with the reality that torments them in only a relatively short time (Clayton and Karazsia 2020); they had slowly built simple houses from agricultural produce over decades, but all were destroyed in just a few hours. The poverty they feel is not only from the physical-material aspect, but also from the psychosocial dimension, which leads to confusion and despair, and therefore, positive reasoning sometimes does not exist, except for only one: having to survive by any means, including logging into the forest (Baldassini et al 2020;Golar et al 2020) and stealing wood to fulfil basic family needs (Parhusip et al 2020).…”