2022
DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00177-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of BNT162b2 against COVID-19 in adolescents

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

7
64
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding these limitations, consistent findings were reached, indicating rapid waning of vaccine protection against symptomatic Omicron infection that are consistent with findings of other studies for effectiveness against Omicron infection (with no BA.1/BA.2 subvariant specified) 42 48 . Moreover, with the mass scale of PCR testing in Qatar 13 , the likelihood of bias is perhaps minimized.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Notwithstanding these limitations, consistent findings were reached, indicating rapid waning of vaccine protection against symptomatic Omicron infection that are consistent with findings of other studies for effectiveness against Omicron infection (with no BA.1/BA.2 subvariant specified) 42 48 . Moreover, with the mass scale of PCR testing in Qatar 13 , the likelihood of bias is perhaps minimized.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The declining VE against infection is similar to results from England, where VE against Omicron and Delta in adolescents aged 16-17 years decreased from 76% and 93% after 7-13 days to 23% and 84% ≥70 days post second dose, respectively. 3 In the US, 2-dose VE against Omicron hospitalization for those aged 12-15 and 16-17 years was 92% and 94% after 14-149 days compared to 73% and 88% after ≥150 days, respectively. 4 This difference in VE over time since second dose was not statistically significant, whereas declines in VE against emergency department (ED) visits were.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although increased protection against infection was observed with early variants of SARS-CoV-2, BNT162b2 has been found to offer limited, short-term protection against the omicron variant. 6,7 In May, 2022, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended a third dose of BNT162b2 for children aged 5-11 years, 8 but real-world experience in adults indicates that protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection will also wane within a few weeks after the third dose. 7 Therefore, unless the plan is to revaccinate every few months, vaccination alone is unlikely to be an effective strategy for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections.…”
Section: Covid-19 Vaccination For Children Aged 5-11 Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Although Sacco and colleagues do not differentiate between those with and without comorbidities, BNT162b2 will probably also help protect healthy children against their very low risk of severe COVID-19, as it does in adolescents and adults. 6,7 However, this protection is lower in children aged 5-11 years than in older age groups, possibly because of their lower vaccine dose (10 mg vs 30 mg). 12 Another reason for vaccinating children aged 5-11 years, as has been shown in adolescents, 13 would be to protect against multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), which is a rare but serious post-infectious, hyperinflammatory syndrome that typically occurs 2-6 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection.…”
Section: Covid-19 Vaccination For Children Aged 5-11 Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%