2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30835-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of BBIBP-CorV vaccine against severe outcomes of COVID-19 in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Abstract: The effectiveness of the inactivated BBIBP-CorV vaccine against severe COVID-19 outcomes (hospitalization, critical care admission and death due to COVID-19) and its long-term effectiveness have not been well characterized among the general population. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records of 3,147,869 adults, of which 1,099,886 vaccinated individuals were matched, in a 1:1 ratio to 1,099,886 unvaccinated persons. A Cox-proportional hazard model with time varying coefficient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study indicates that two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech or Sinopharm vaccines at least fourteen days after administration provided significant reduction in coronavirus-associated hospitalizations at Prince Hamza Hospital in Jordan. Based upon the hospitalization rates of patients in our patient cohort, it is evident that Sinopharm (VE 92%) is less effective than Pfizer-BioNTech (VE 67%) These results are consistent with previous studies, in particular, those done during the period between March and July, and February and August 2021, which showed the VE of Pfizer-BioNTech and Sinopharm against hospitalization rates to be 86% (95% CI = 82–88%) ( 10 , 11 ), and 79.6% (95% CI 77.7–81.3%) ( 12 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our study indicates that two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech or Sinopharm vaccines at least fourteen days after administration provided significant reduction in coronavirus-associated hospitalizations at Prince Hamza Hospital in Jordan. Based upon the hospitalization rates of patients in our patient cohort, it is evident that Sinopharm (VE 92%) is less effective than Pfizer-BioNTech (VE 67%) These results are consistent with previous studies, in particular, those done during the period between March and July, and February and August 2021, which showed the VE of Pfizer-BioNTech and Sinopharm against hospitalization rates to be 86% (95% CI = 82–88%) ( 10 , 11 ), and 79.6% (95% CI 77.7–81.3%) ( 12 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Another point that merits mention is that our dataset was retrieved from a private company’s database, rather than from a well-structured national registry for COVID-19 infection and vaccination. At the time the study was conducted, such a registry was unavailable in Lebanon, unlike the situation in other middle eastern countries such as Qatar and the United Arab Emirates [ 19 , 46 , 52 ]. The studied cohort included mostly young and healthy individuals, which is not representative of the Lebanese population regarding age, comorbidities, and socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third COVID-19 vaccine to be compared in this paper is Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV), an inactivated virus combined with an alum adjuvant made from virus particles and grown in culture and thus improving immunogenicity [ 18 ]. BBIBP-CorV was created by the Beijing Institute of Biological Products and has a 79% efficacy [ 116 ]. Since BBIBP-CorV uses a completely inactivated virus, it is predicted to trigger an immune response against all SARS-CoV-2 proteins: nucleocapsid (N), membranes (M), envelope (E) proteins, and spike proteins (S) [ 117 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%