In any field, it is appropriate to periodically reflect on what practice has been substantiated by research in the field, as well as what implications that research may have for future endeavors. This research review of the field of aquatics for individuals with disabilities discusses problems with definition of the field and narrows this definition for more detailed consideration. Using a database spanning over half a century and containing over 900 items classified as related to adapted aquatics, the quality, content, and substance of research in adapted aquatics are considered for reflection. Finally, recommendations are made for future research directions to better support growth in the field, as well as health and wellness of individuals with disabilities.Reflecting on aquatics for individuals with disabilities first requires more detailed definition of terms. In the broadest sense, aquatics for individuals with disabilities could mean adapted aquatics, hydrotherapy, and/or aquatic therapy. More specifically, aquatics for individuals with disabilities might include instructional swim, competitive swim, aquatic exercise, recreational aquatics, small craft, lifesaving and water safety, and water learning. Any one of these subgroups could be further subdivided into more specific activities. For example, aquatic therapy could be broken down into Bad Ragaz, Watsu, Ai Chi, and a host of other therapeutic modalities. Furthermore, aquatics for individuals with disabilities can be defined by the specific population groups participating, aquatic exercise for individuals with arthritis, for example, or sailing for individuals who are paraplegics. The wide variety of possible combinations provides almost unlimited potential for accumulating extensive research in the field; however, this wide variance appears, to the contrary, to have resulted in a very limited body of research determined knowledge from which little consensus can be drawn.In addition, establishing research quality criteria is also problematic. Within the population of individuals with disabilities, even within a population that is disability specific, obtaining a matching population sample is almost impossible, as no two disabilities present in exactly the same manner. In addition, finding even a similarly-homogeneous sample of the population in sufficient enough numbers to be statistically relevant is also very difficult. The more severe the disability, the smaller the population with this disability. Keeping these factors and potential Susan Grosse is president of the Aquatic Consulting and Educational Resources Services in Milwaukee, WI.
MethodologyFor purposes of compiling research results in aquatics for individuals with disabilities, limitations had to be placed on the definition of the field. For the purposes of this analysis, "aquatics" is used in the broadest participatory activity sense; however, hydrotherapy research, that is, the investigation of medically prescribed, diagnosis specific, manipulative therapy performed in a physical therapy ...