2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of antiangiogenic drugs in glioblastoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, these findings are in line with previous studies of BEV for newly diagnosed glioblastoma, in which improvements in PFS with the addition of BEV to RT and TMZ did not translate to an OS benefit . A recent meta‐analysis showed that BEV improved PFS, both alone and in combination with chemotherapy, and both as first‐line treatment or in recurrent glioblastoma, but no improvement in OS was observed . The median OS of 6.4 months for BEV‐treated patients in the current study was shorter than that reported in a previous phase II trial of BEV at first recurrence (9 months) ; however, in that study (the BRAIN study), patients had no prior exposure to BEV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Overall, these findings are in line with previous studies of BEV for newly diagnosed glioblastoma, in which improvements in PFS with the addition of BEV to RT and TMZ did not translate to an OS benefit . A recent meta‐analysis showed that BEV improved PFS, both alone and in combination with chemotherapy, and both as first‐line treatment or in recurrent glioblastoma, but no improvement in OS was observed . The median OS of 6.4 months for BEV‐treated patients in the current study was shorter than that reported in a previous phase II trial of BEV at first recurrence (9 months) ; however, in that study (the BRAIN study), patients had no prior exposure to BEV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Unfortunately, this success has had only limited impact on overall survival of cancer patients, and rarely resulted in durable responses. Bevacizumab (Avastin), an FDA approved anti-angiogenic drug (anti-VEGF), did not show significant improvement in overall survival [112][113][114]. Therefore, other anti-angiogenic agents and combinatorial strategies are being tested to target complex tumor microenvironment.…”
Section: Inhibition Of Tumor Angiogenesis Enhances Anti-tumor Potentimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, additional efforts have been made with small molecule kinase inhibitors that target multiple receptors involved in angiogenesis in glioblastoma and other brain tumors such as PDGF-R, FGF-R, VEGF-R, etc. These molecules have been so far used in Phase I–III trials; however, all of them have also failed and they are actually inferior to Avastin [ 205 ].…”
Section: Conventional and New Interventions That Target The Endothmentioning
confidence: 99%