Effectiveness of an interactive virtual telerehabilitation system in patients after total knee arthoplasty: A randomized controlled trial

Piqueras, Mercè; Marco, Ester; Coll, M.; Escalada, Ferrán; Ballester, Alex; Cinca, Carme; Belmonte, R.; Muniesa, Josep M.

doi:10.2340/16501977-1119

Cited by 171 publications

(319 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

279

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…600,602 There was no suggestion of risk of bias in nine studies. 520,589,590,[595][596][597][598][599]601 There was no clear evidence of publication bias from inspection of funnel plots. However, numbers of studies were small for several outcomes and in subgroup analyses.…”

Section: Study Qualitymentioning

confidence: 92%

“…Range of motion extension was reported in three studies with 261 patients 595,599,602 and ROM flexion in five studies with 448 patients. 594,595,599,602 Outcomes are summarised in Table 96 and Figure 54.…”

Section: Range Of Motionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…520,592,594,595,599,602 Patient-reported physical function Physical function was measured using WOMAC, KOOS and OKS measures. Data were available at one or more time points for five studies with 437 patients.…”

Section: 601mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…594,595,599,602 Outcomes are summarised in Table 96 and Figure 54. There was no suggestion of a difference in ROM extension between randomised groups at any time point.…”

Section: Range Of Motionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Improving patients’ experience and outcome of total joint replacement: the RESTORE programme

Blom

Artz

Beswick

et al. 2016

Programme Grants Appl Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH VOLUME 4 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2016 ISSN 2050 DOI 10.3310/pgfar04120Improving patients' experience and outcome of total joint replacement: the RESTORE programme Ashley W Blom, Neil Artz, Andrew D Beswick, Amanda Burston, Paul Dieppe, Karen T Elvers, Rachael Gooberman-Hill, Jeremy Horwood, Paul Jepson, Emma Johnson, Erik Lenguerrand, Elsa Marques, Sian Noble, Mark Pyke, Catherine Sackley, Gina Sands, Adrian Sayers, Victoria Wells and Vikki Wylde Improving patients' experience and outcome of total joint replacement: the RESTORE programme ISSN 2050-4330 (Online) This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full PGfAR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/pgfar. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Programme Grants for Applied Research journalReports are published in Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the PGfAR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors. Programme Grants for Applied Research programmeThe Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 2006 to produce independent research findings that will have practical application for the benefit of patients and the NHS in the relatively near future. The Programme is managed by the NIHR Central Commissioning Facility (CCF) with strategic input from the Programme Director.The programme is a national response mode funding scheme that aims to provide evidence to improve health outcomes in England through promotion of health, prevention of ill health, and optimal disease management (including safety and quality), with particular emphasis on conditions causing significant disease burden.For more information about the PGfAR programme please visit the website: http://www.nihr.ac.uk/funding/programme-grants-forapplied-research.htm This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by PGfAR as project number RP-PG-0407-10070. The contractual start date was in December 2008. The final report began editorial review in September 2014 and was accepted for publication in August 2015. As the funder, the PGfAR programme agreed the research questions and study designs in advance with the investigators. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The PGfAR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accurac...

show abstract

Section: Study Qualitymentioning

confidence: 92%

Section: Range Of Motionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: 601mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…594,595,599,602 Outcomes are summarised in Table 96 and Figure 54. There was no suggestion of a difference in ROM extension between randomised groups at any time point.…”

Section: Range Of Motionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Improving patients’ experience and outcome of total joint replacement: the RESTORE programme

Blom

Artz

Beswick

et al. 2016

Programme Grants Appl Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Because of such characteristics, many researchers have tried to use VR-based games as a rehabilitation tool for patients with neurological [3][4][5][6] and musculoskeletal [7] conditions and burn injuries [8][9][10]. Recently, the Nintendo Wii Fit Plus (NWFP) was evaluated as an adjunct to conventional physical therapy for outpatients following total knee replacement, and it showed similar effects as conventional physical therapy in improving lower-limb and balance outcomes [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient perspectives on virtual reality-based rehabilitation after knee surgery: Importance of level of difficulty

Lee¹,

Suh²,

Son

et al. 2016

J Rehabil Res Dev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-This article explored the perspectives of 25 patients regarding virtual reality (VR)-based rehabilitation following knee surgery and identified the important factors that allowed patients to immerse themselves in rehabilitation. Qualitative analysis of data collected via open-ended questionnaire and quantitative analysis of data from physical assessments and surveys were conducted. In the open-ended questionnaire, the majority of participants mentioned level of difficulty as the most common reason for selecting both the most and the least immersive exercise programs. Quantitative analysis showed that participants experienced a high level of flow (3.9 +/-0.3 out of 5.0) and a high rate of expectation of therapeutic effect (96%) and intention of exercise adherence (96%). Further, participants with more severe pain or physical dysfunction tended to have more positive experiences (e.g., Difficulty-Skill Balance, Clear Goals, and Transformation of Time), leading to high levels of flow during VR-based rehabilitation. In conclusion, VR-based games are potentially acceptable as a motivational rehabilitation tool for patients following knee surgery. However, to best meet patients' needs, it might be useful to equip a VR program with varied levels of difficulty, taking into account the severity of the individual's knee injury. Additionally, severe pain or physical dysfunction might act as an indication rather than a contraindication for VR-based rehabilitation.

show abstract

Telerehabilitation versus conventional face-to-face land-based exercises following hip or knee arthroplasty

Alexandre

Ramalho

Civile

et al. 2021

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effectiveness of an interactive virtual telerehabilitation system in patients after total knee arthoplasty: A randomized controlled trial

Cited by 171 publications

References 17 publications

Improving patients’ experience and outcome of total joint replacement: the RESTORE programme

Improving patients’ experience and outcome of total joint replacement: the RESTORE programme

Patient perspectives on virtual reality-based rehabilitation after knee surgery: Importance of level of difficulty

Telerehabilitation versus conventional face-to-face land-based exercises following hip or knee arthroplasty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About