2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2009.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of an aerobic walking program using heart rate monitor and pedometer on the parameters of diabetes control in Asian Indians with type 2 diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of the included studies are reported in Table 1 [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Eleven of the included randomized controlled trials compared before and after HbA1c levels within the experimental and control groups.…”
Section: Description Of Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of the included studies are reported in Table 1 [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Eleven of the included randomized controlled trials compared before and after HbA1c levels within the experimental and control groups.…”
Section: Description Of Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, 1,261 articles were retrieved from electronic databases and manual searches, 161 articles were included based on review of the title, 33 based on review of the abstract, and 20 [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] based on review of the full text article (ESM Fig. 1).…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study thus showed that PRT provided better results than aerobic exercise for general well-being and cholesterol reduction. Shenoy, Guglani, and Sandhu (2010) studied the effects of an intensity monitored aerobic walking program on Asian Indians with T2DM. Forty participants (40-70 years of age; diabetes for 1-10 years) who were not on insulin were randomized to either a walking group (n = 20) or a control group (n = 20).…”
Section: Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%