2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of acoustic indices as indicators of vertebrate biodiversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R ² = 0.62), good explanatory power for richness of old-growth species and nocturnal insect composition, but low explanatory power for total vertebrate richness (Table 1 ). Our findings add to the growing literature that shows that using a set of acoustic indices instead of single ones is better for estimating biodiversity 50 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…R ² = 0.62), good explanatory power for richness of old-growth species and nocturnal insect composition, but low explanatory power for total vertebrate richness (Table 1 ). Our findings add to the growing literature that shows that using a set of acoustic indices instead of single ones is better for estimating biodiversity 50 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Despite a much higher concentration of A2O sites in the eastern states of Australia, there is still potential to monitor critically endangered species in all states except the Northern Territory (Figure 1b). In addition, some of the species we list as possibly detectable in recordings, have already been incidentally detected in the audio data for six sites where we are conducting on‐ground surveys, which are Rinyurru, Undara, Wambiana, Mourachan, Duval and Tarcutta (Allen‐Ankins et al, 2023). Using monitoR templates (Katz et al, 2016), we have detected koalas ( Phascolarctos cinereus ; Mt.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the observatory was designed to sample broadly, in moderately pristine habitats, a representative sample of Australia's six largest ecoregions (https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/land/nrs/science/ibra/australias-ecoregions), and the purpose of the observatory is to provide data and monitor fauna in general, for example to detect declines and movements of common species, and to allow for a range of other kinds of studies of vocal animal biology (Roe et al, 2021), the A2O may also aid in conservation of endangered species. The observatory has already detected several threatened species in several locations, specifically in areas where these detections were verified by visual observations, where we are carrying out ground‐truthing biodiversity surveys, and thus in locations where we were specifically searching the data for species based on both species distributions and observations (Allen‐Ankins et al, 2023). Targeted screening of data by creation and use of supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms, or using citizen science or combinations of these techniques, and other focussed study designed to search all sites for calls will reveal other species at other sites, and the efficacy and efficiency of automated acoustic analysis tools is only growing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Wider testing has demonstrated that associating acoustic indices with biodiversity metrics, such as species richness, diversity or abundance, is not straightforward. There has been some success in linking acoustic indices to the presence of individual species (Brodie et al, 2022; Papin et al, 2019; Towsey et al, 2018; Znidersic et al, 2020), or to broader taxon richness (Allen‐Ankins et al, 2023; Bradfer‐Lawrence et al, 2020; Dröge et al, 2021; Roca & Van Opzeeland, 2020). However, there are contradictory patterns reported in the literature.…”
Section: Identifying Your Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%