Effectiveness of a systematic approach to promote intersectoral collaboration in comprehensive school health promotion-a multiple-case study using quantitative and qualitative data

Pucher, K; Candel, Math J. J. M.; Krumeich, Anja; Boot, N.M.W.M.; Vries, Nanne K. de

doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1911-2

Cited by 25 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Assessment of the applied models revealed that there was a fairly good variation in studies. The applied models were: DISC (17)(18)(19)(20), Bergen (11,14), Himelman (15), network analysis (16), social network analysis (10,21), act for life collaboration continuum (22), Tukman (23), collective impact approach (24), system analysis (25), and logic (26,27).…”

Section: Results Of the Extraction Of Criteria Models And Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A positive experience of collaboration/the desire to continue the collaboration, and sustainability in the collaboration: Sustainability in collaboration is de ned as the gradual development of a sustainable collaboration (20). If collaborators have a positive experience of their previous collaborative process, they will need less energy to make internal changes and will feel more support for policies affecting them, which will eventually help them create a sustainable collaborative process (18).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Basic Criteria, Models, and Indicators of Intersectoral Collaboration in Health Promotion: A Scoping Study

Rafiee

Damari

Hajebi

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The healthcare sector has a small share in community health, and other sectors are actively involved in this domain. Therefore, only by a collective and collaborative action can health promotion interventions be properly implemented. In order to have intersectoral collaboration in the domain of healthcare, basic criteria are required as an operational guide for the successful implementation of such collaborations. A specific framework is also required so that the programs can be properly implemented accordingly. After the implementation, the success or failure of the collaborative action will be determined by assessing the effectiveness of the actions taken using an appropriate assessment system (e.g., indicators). In this study, the basic criteria, models, and indicators of intersectoral collaboration in health promotion were investigated to facilitate the implementation of collaboration. Methods: This scoping review was conducted using datasets of Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, and search engines of Google, Google Scholar, and ProQuest. Original articles, review articles, and reports were included in this study. In terms of subject, articles which referred to the basic criteria, models, or indicators of intersectoral collaboration in health promotion were included. Results: A total of 52 studies were included in the final analysis, and 32 codes in three categories (micro, meso, and macro) were obtained. Micro-level intersectoral collaboration criteria had the highest frequency. Among the models used in the reviewed studies, social network analysis (SNA), Diagnosis of Sustainable Collaboration (DISC), Bergen, and logic models had the highest frequency in health promotion. Among the indicators studied, the number of participants and the level of collaboration as well as its sustainability were the most frequent indicators. Conclusion: The findings identified the most important and widely used criteria, models, and indicators of intersectoral collaboration in health promotion which can be useful for decision-makers and planners in the domain of health promotion, in designing, implementing, and evaluating collaborative programs.

show abstract

Section: Results Of the Extraction Of Criteria Models And Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Basic Criteria, Models, and Indicators of Intersectoral Collaboration in Health Promotion: A Scoping Study

Rafiee

Damari

Hajebi

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Analysts also study the impact of network structures [63,[74][75][76], arguing that networks rely on network efficiency and density [63,75,76]. In contrast, network breadth can decrease performance, creating difficulties in reaching consensus and creating trust within a [63,[74][75][76] • Network geography [50,67,77] • Creating connectivity/consensus [78] • Co-creation [79] • Planning [80] • Managing performance [81,82] • Continuous learning [83,84] • Sharing information [85] • Pooling resources/expertise [13,86,87] • Committed/credible leaders [88][89][90][91][92][93] • Nurturing linkages [41,51,[94][95][96][97] • Aligning goals and creating shared understandings [95,98] Organisation level (15 studies)…”

Section: Leadership Mediamentioning

confidence: 99%

Leadership in Integrated Care Networks: A Literature Review and Opportunities for Future Research

Mitterlechner

2020

Int J Integr Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In many countries, elderly patients with chronic conditions require a web of services delivered by several providers collaborating in inter-organisational networks. In view of their global importance, it is surprising how little we know how these networks are led. Like traditional organisations, networks require leadership to function effectively. This paper reviews central characteristics of leadership in integrated care networks and proposes opportunities for future research. Theory and methods: Analysing 73 studies published in leading academic journals, this paper consolidates research on leadership media, practices, activities and outcomes, covering the network, policy and organisation levels of analysis. Results: Findings indicate that the field has focused on leadership media and outcomes at the network level. They also suggest that leadership in integrated care networks faces multiple tensions. Future research could usefully provide a fuller picture by examining leadership practices, activities and outcomes at the policy and organisation level, integrating advances in the wider leadership literature. Discussion and conclusion: These findings contribute to the debate on leadership in integrated care networks. They also inform practice, drawing attention to persistent tensions as a core leadership challenge and offering latest scholarly evidence practitioners can use to reflect on and advance their own leadership practice.

show abstract

“…Interorganizational collaboration makes possible information exchange, advice giving and pooling of resources for successful implementation (Palinkas et al, 2014). Moreover, collaboration requires supportive perceptions, intentions, and actions (Pucher, Candel, Krumeich, Boot, & De Vries, 2015). Tooher et al, (2017) elucidated that the focus of the study in collaboration is on process networks and sectoral agenda alignment.…”

Section: Inter-organizational Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborating Local Government Agencies to Prevention Adolescent Reproductive Health in Makassar, Indonesia

Hadna

Nasrulhaq

2019

otoritas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collaboration is an approach and concept of managing public policy in Makassar, Indonesia. Recently, the municipality of Makassar has capitalized on the collaboration of local government agencies regarding public affairs to prevent issues of Adolescent Reproductive Health (ARH). ARH is a strategic issue for local government so that it is solved collaboratively. The collaborating governmental organization comprises the Department of Education, Health, Family Planning, and all of the Urban Villages. This research employed a qualitative method focusing on the analysis of collaborative phenomena of local government agencies in Generation Planning Program through Adolescent Counseling Information Center (ACIC) and Adolescent Families Development (AFD) in Makassar. Data were obtained and analyzed in an orderly and structured manner with general qualitative approach. Based on the field research, the local government agencies collaborate in two ways. The first collaboration deals with the sectoral term which is the involvement of the government agencies related to adolescent reproductive health policy. The second collaboration deals with the regional term including the involvement of the Sub-District and Urban Villages in Makassar as grassroots bureaucracy. Collaborative themes and relations are the main findings in this article. An interesting theme in the idea of collaboration is mutual interdependence, while an exciting theme in the implementation of collaborative action is joint interaction. Organizational relationships in collaboration between local government agencies are coordination, consolidation, consultation, and command. This study concluded that sectoral and regional collaboration is proper in bringing a solution to public health affairs that are very complex.

show abstract

Effectiveness of a systematic approach to promote intersectoral collaboration in comprehensive school health promotion-a multiple-case study using quantitative and qualitative data

Cited by 25 publications

References 26 publications

Basic Criteria, Models, and Indicators of Intersectoral Collaboration in Health Promotion: A Scoping Study

Basic Criteria, Models, and Indicators of Intersectoral Collaboration in Health Promotion: A Scoping Study

Leadership in Integrated Care Networks: A Literature Review and Opportunities for Future Research

Collaborating Local Government Agencies to Prevention Adolescent Reproductive Health in Makassar, Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About