2016
DOI: 10.23846/ow2063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of a rural sanitation programme on diarrhoea, soil-transmitted helminth infection and malnutrition in India

Abstract: The International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie) is an international grant-making NGO promoting evidence-informed development policies and programmes. We are the global leader in funding, producing and synthesising high-quality evidence of what works, how, why and at what cost. We believe that better and policy-relevant evidence will make development more effective and improve people's lives. 3ie impact evaluations3ie-supported impact evaluations assess the difference a development intervention has mad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(46 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also found no improved results from integrating those nutritional interventions with (individual or combined) WASH interventions. These findings are similar to those reported by Patil et al (2014) and Clasen et al (2014) in rural India: large-scale community sanitation programmes did not improve health outcomes (diarrhoea, HCGI, helminth, and open defecation behaviour) among under five and under two age children. Similarly, Dangour, Watson, and Cumming et al (2013) report that other five cluster RCTs in Pakistan (Luby et al, 2004(Luby et al, , 2006, South Africa (Du Preez, McGuigan, & Conroy, 2010), and Kenya (Du Preez, Conroy, Ligondo, Hennessy, & Elmore-Meegan, 2011) had no significant effects on height-for-age Z (HAZ) scores.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…They also found no improved results from integrating those nutritional interventions with (individual or combined) WASH interventions. These findings are similar to those reported by Patil et al (2014) and Clasen et al (2014) in rural India: large-scale community sanitation programmes did not improve health outcomes (diarrhoea, HCGI, helminth, and open defecation behaviour) among under five and under two age children. Similarly, Dangour, Watson, and Cumming et al (2013) report that other five cluster RCTs in Pakistan (Luby et al, 2004(Luby et al, , 2006, South Africa (Du Preez, McGuigan, & Conroy, 2010), and Kenya (Du Preez, Conroy, Ligondo, Hennessy, & Elmore-Meegan, 2011) had no significant effects on height-for-age Z (HAZ) scores.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In this study, the children whose family had no clean water supply were more likely to develop diarrhea than children whose families had clean water storage in implemented CLTSH and not significant in unimplemented CLTSH area. This study is supported by a study in India 19 and study in Nigeria 39 which showed that transmission of diarrhea occurs easily when in-house water-storage facilities are contaminated. Despite the use of water from protected sources and water treatment practice, many people do not wash their hands before getting water from storage containers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…With respect to future research, our findings imply that any investigation of the role of open defaecation in determining anaemia requires variation that arises at the level of a neighbourhood or region (as it does in our empirical analysis), rather than at the person-level. This suggests that the kind of clusterrandomised trials that have recently been fielded to examine other aspects of local sanitation (Clasen et al, 2015;Guiteras et al, 2015) are also the right approach for future experimental work that builds on our findings regarding anaemia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%