2016
DOI: 10.15365/joce.1903082016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of a Parent-Child Home Numeracy Intervention on Urban Catholic School First Grade Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result also implies that the parents and the teacher played their roles in the Parent-Teacher Partnership, which caused a significant change in the numeracy skills of the students. This is an affirmation of a study that is using parents as partners trained in providing at-home numeracy support is a viable means for increasing students' early mathematics performance [9]. In addition, a concept that supports the result states that the Parental Roles in Students' Learning of Mathematics show that parental involvement is a significant predictor of student mathematics achievement [3].…”
Section: Table 3 Test For Significant Difference Between the Level Of...mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The result also implies that the parents and the teacher played their roles in the Parent-Teacher Partnership, which caused a significant change in the numeracy skills of the students. This is an affirmation of a study that is using parents as partners trained in providing at-home numeracy support is a viable means for increasing students' early mathematics performance [9]. In addition, a concept that supports the result states that the Parental Roles in Students' Learning of Mathematics show that parental involvement is a significant predictor of student mathematics achievement [3].…”
Section: Table 3 Test For Significant Difference Between the Level Of...mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…BBraham et al (2018); Cheung and McBride (2017); Cheung and McBride‐Chang (2015); de Chambrier et al (2021); de Vries et al (2021); Dulay et al (2019); Gibson et al (2020); Gilmore et al (2021); Griffith et al (2019); Hanner et al (2019); Hess (2017); Johnson (1981); Klein et al (2008); lanch (2002); Klein et al (study 1), (2019); Klein et al (study 2), (2019); Leyva et al (2018); Leyva et al (2021); Lore et al (2016); McCarthy et al (2018); Napoli and Purpura (2021); Niklas et al (2016); Niklas et al (2018); Pasnik et al (2015); Polinsky et al (2017); Purpura et al (2021); Ramani and Scalise (2020); Sonnenschein et al (study 1), 2016; Sonnenschein et al (study 2), 2016; Sophian (2004); Vandermaas‐Peeler, Bloomgarden, et al (2012); Vandermaas‐Peeler, Ferretti, (2012); Vandermaas‐Peeler et al (2018); Vandermaas‐Peeler et al (2016); Vandermaas‐Peeler et al (2019)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to informal settings, an upward trend exists in the quantity of empirical research that investigates the effectiveness of early math and literacy interventions in informal environments (e.g., Berkowitz et al, 2015; Lore et al, 2016; Niklas et al, 2016; Sonnenschein et al, 2016; Starkey & Klein, 2000). However, few reviews of these newly emerging intervention studies have been completed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we would have allowed studies with methodological flaws to be included in the current meta-analysis, those study flaws would have transferred to the meta-analysis and potentially lead to a biased estimate of effect. We excluded one study with severe levels of attrition (i.e., more than 50%; Lore et al, 2016), one study that employed a treatment group-only design (Leyva et al, 2018), and one study that used nonrandomization procedures without administering a pretest and also lacked specific information needed to estimate the effect of clustering on variance estimates (Austin, 1988). Note.…”
Section: Literature Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%