2001
DOI: 10.1054/jcms.2000.0188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of a new perforated 0.15 mm poly-p-dioxanon-foil versus titanium-dynamic mesh in reconstruction of the orbital floor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These three biomaterials are widely used in maxillofacial trauma as reconstruction of orbital floor fracture and in craniofacial surgery to reconstruct cranial base. [28][29][30][31] Beriplast represents an absorbable natural polymer. Fibrin glue (Beriplast) has been used widespreadly in operative medicine more than 20 years and is used for one or more purposes in surgical repair: Tissue welding, hemostatic agent, fluid barrier, and space filling growth matrix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These three biomaterials are widely used in maxillofacial trauma as reconstruction of orbital floor fracture and in craniofacial surgery to reconstruct cranial base. [28][29][30][31] Beriplast represents an absorbable natural polymer. Fibrin glue (Beriplast) has been used widespreadly in operative medicine more than 20 years and is used for one or more purposes in surgical repair: Tissue welding, hemostatic agent, fluid barrier, and space filling growth matrix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Titanium mesh represents a metal group and is used in cranioplasty or reconstructions of orbital floor fracture. 29,33 Primary HOB-like cells were used as they are representative of the cell type in contact with the material in vivo. The source of the cell for cultivation in vitro is of great importance for the development of transplanted substitutes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors concluded that the titanium plate or mesh alone was an effective and safe reconstruction material. [25][26][27] Gear et al 25 showed, in a clinical study with 67 reconstructed orbital fractures with a titanium mesh, good functional results and minimal risk for infection. As the titanium is a nonresorbable material, there is no potential for replacement by host tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), [26][27][28][29][30][31] allogenic grafts, [32,33] and alloplastic materials (silicone, polytetrafluoroethylene, hydroxylapatite, porous polyethylene, titanium, and Vitallium mesh). [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] There are studies outlining their advantages, disadvantages and success rates. Cadaver-based allogenic bone grafts are not preferred due to risk of viral infection transmission, resorption rate and their costly nature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%