IGARSS 2008 - 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2008
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2008.4779605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of 2D FDTD Ground Penetrating Radar Modeling for Bridge Deck Deterioration Evaluated by 3D FDTD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twodimensional simulations are less expensive in terms of computation resources, and it is more feasible to analyze large regions than 3D models. More importantly, 2D and 3D models are both based on the physical basis of radar wave propagation, and when they are used together for the same model, the shapes of waveforms (including the peak arrival times) are consistent with each other (Belli et al, 2009;Zhan et al, 2009). Therefore, the FDTD-2D code is used for our purpose.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of the Lprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twodimensional simulations are less expensive in terms of computation resources, and it is more feasible to analyze large regions than 3D models. More importantly, 2D and 3D models are both based on the physical basis of radar wave propagation, and when they are used together for the same model, the shapes of waveforms (including the peak arrival times) are consistent with each other (Belli et al, 2009;Zhan et al, 2009). Therefore, the FDTD-2D code is used for our purpose.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of the Lprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method, a powerful tool for numerical modeling, is an appropriate tool for EM wave propagation simulation [ 9 ]. Although most of the research using the FDTD method has focused on the detection of underground objects, such as faults and caves, tunnel inspections, pipes, and landmines [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ], this method has recently been applied to bridge assessment and inspection as well as pavement surface-moisture removal [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Microstructure and density of AC pavement research using the FDTD method, however, is still limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%