2022
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1046613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness, cost-utility and physiological underpinnings of the FIBROWALK multicomponent therapy in online and outdoor format in individuals with fibromyalgia: Study protocol of a randomized, controlled trial (On&Out study)

Abstract: Introduction: The On&Out study is aimed at assessing the effectiveness, cost-utility and physiological underpinnings of the FIBROWALK multicomponent intervention conducted in two different settings: online (FIBRO-On) or outdoors (FIBRO-Out). Both interventions have proved to be efficacious in the short-term but there is no study assessing their comparative effectiveness nor their long-term effects. For the first time, this study will also evaluate the cost-utility (6-month time-horizon) and the effects… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 129 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these cases, the first paper presenting the intervention was included in the review (i.e., defined “primary paper”), while the subsequent papers were excluded from the flowchart ( Figure 1 ) and whenever we reported quantitative information on the number of papers. However, when relevant data were reported in these so called “secondary analyses papers”, they were inserted in Table A1 [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ] and in the corresponding sections of the results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, the first paper presenting the intervention was included in the review (i.e., defined “primary paper”), while the subsequent papers were excluded from the flowchart ( Figure 1 ) and whenever we reported quantitative information on the number of papers. However, when relevant data were reported in these so called “secondary analyses papers”, they were inserted in Table A1 [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ] and in the corresponding sections of the results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%