2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2018.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness and tolerability of direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C patients in a Southern state of Brazil

Abstract: The results point to the effectiveness of second-generation direct-acting antivirals in hepatitis C virus Brazilian patients, especially those with genotype 1. Furthermore, that patients with genotype 3 need more attention and adjustments in available treatment options.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
18
0
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
18
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…SVR was high (98.1%), with no significant differences between groups, in agreement with other Brazilian studies that found an SVR of 91.6‐95% . International studies also showed high rates of response to treatment, ranging from 78.6‐90%, depending on the treatment regimen used …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…SVR was high (98.1%), with no significant differences between groups, in agreement with other Brazilian studies that found an SVR of 91.6‐95% . International studies also showed high rates of response to treatment, ranging from 78.6‐90%, depending on the treatment regimen used …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…[24][25][26][27] SVR was high (98.1%), with no significant differences between groups, in agreement with other Brazilian studies that found an SVR of 91.6-95%. 13,28,29 International studies also showed high rates of response to treatment, ranging from 78.6-90%, depending on the treatment regimen used. 14,22,[30][31][32] The most recent Brazilian protocol recommends use of ribavirin for patients with cirrhosis, with a lower chance of SVR (genotype 3, men, aged >40 years), or by medical decision, with consideration of previous intolerance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Um estudo de coorte alemão demonstrou que 92% dos pacientes que utilizaram SOF e DCV alcançaram RVS, enquanto 93% dos pacientes que utilizaram SOF e SMV alcançaram RVS(WERNER et al, 2016). Em estudo de vida real brasileiro realizado por Ferreira e colaboradores, o uso de tratamentos compostos por SOF e DCV proporcionou taxas de RVS de aproximadamente 95%, enquanto as taxas de RVS com o uso de SOF e SMV foram de aproximadamente 92%(FERREIRA et al, 2018).A tabela 6 descreve as taxas de RVS dentro de cada variável analisada, separadas por esquema de tratamento utilizado. Model for End-stage Liver Disease.…”
unclassified
“…DCV e pacientes tratados com SOF e SMV para as variáveis: subgenótipo viral, presença de cirrose hepática, história de tratamento prévio e carga viral prétratamento. O mesmo estudo também não identificou diferenças nos resultados de RVS de pacientes que foram tratados por 12 ou 24 semanas, e que fizeram ou não uso de RBV associada aos esquemas de tratamento(FERREIRA et al, 2018). Descrição das frequências absoluta e relativa das RAMs 1 observadas em cada esquema de tratamento utilizado.…”
unclassified