2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40121-022-00666-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness and Safety of Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir as a Hepatitis C Virus Infection Salvage Therapy in the Real World: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract: Introduction: Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) is the first direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy approved for patients who have previously failed a DAA-containing regimen including NS5A inhibitors. In clinical trials, SOF/VEL/VOX was associated with high rates of sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12) and was well tolerated. However, the effectiveness and safety of SOF/VEL/VOX in the real world remained uncertain. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(121 reference statements)
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pangenotypic regimen SOF/VEL/ VOX represents a highly effective salvage therapy for patients who have experienced prior DAA failure. [5] Indeed, our data indicate that SOF/VEL/VOX efficacy does not decrease in the presence of PIB or VEL-induced NS5A-RASs, thus supporting its recommendation as re-treatment therapy. [10] However, the effectiveness of the triple-DAA regimen was challenged by the combination of SOF and VEL resistance, which is in agreement with studies reporting lower SOF/VEL/ VOX cure rates in SOF/VEL treatment-experienced patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pangenotypic regimen SOF/VEL/ VOX represents a highly effective salvage therapy for patients who have experienced prior DAA failure. [5] Indeed, our data indicate that SOF/VEL/VOX efficacy does not decrease in the presence of PIB or VEL-induced NS5A-RASs, thus supporting its recommendation as re-treatment therapy. [10] However, the effectiveness of the triple-DAA regimen was challenged by the combination of SOF and VEL resistance, which is in agreement with studies reporting lower SOF/VEL/ VOX cure rates in SOF/VEL treatment-experienced patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…[10] However, the effectiveness of the triple-DAA regimen was challenged by the combination of SOF and VEL resistance, which is in agreement with studies reporting lower SOF/VEL/ VOX cure rates in SOF/VEL treatment-experienced patients. [5] Thus, the addition of at least 2 new DAAs (and not only VOX) might be necessary for the retreatment of SOF/VEL treatment-experienced patients. In contrast, for GLE/PIB treatment-experienced patients, this triple salvage therapy might be sufficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, all patients responded to SOF/VEL/VOX therapy, although data from a meta-analysis by Xie et al from a Canadian centre indicated that this option was less effective in patients previously treated with SOF/VEL [ 23 ]. The 12-week SOF/VEL/VOX therapy may be an effective option not only for patients with failed genotype-specific therapy, but also for those who failed to achieve SVR 12 on the pangenotypic GLE/PIB regimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The most common adverse event, reported by 10% of patients, was fatigue. Headaches, nausea, diarrhoea, and itchiness were reported in less than 2% of cases, while in other studies these numbers reached 4–10% [ 23 ]. Anaemia was reported in three of our patients, and in all cases was related to the selection of the therapeutic option with RBV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%