2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness and limitation of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in bacterial membrane protein proteomics and perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, this proteomic profile probably represents the proteins most abundantly displayed on the cell envelope of B. longum NCIMB 8809, a human isolate with the capacity to produce an antimicrobial substance (O'Riordan & Fitzgerald, 1998). 2D electrophoresis-based workflows, the most popular techniques for the study of bacterial stress responses, do not provide information on hydrophobic proteins, mainly membrane proteins, due to technical difficulties in retaining their solubility during the isoelectrofocusing and limitations in reliable quantification (Bunai & Yamane, 2005;Speers & Wu, 2007). Some of these disadvantages have been overcome with new techniques based on improved solubilizing agents or isotopic labelling (Couté et al, 2007;Speers & Wu, 2007), expanding the possibilities for analysing bacterial membrane subproteomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, this proteomic profile probably represents the proteins most abundantly displayed on the cell envelope of B. longum NCIMB 8809, a human isolate with the capacity to produce an antimicrobial substance (O'Riordan & Fitzgerald, 1998). 2D electrophoresis-based workflows, the most popular techniques for the study of bacterial stress responses, do not provide information on hydrophobic proteins, mainly membrane proteins, due to technical difficulties in retaining their solubility during the isoelectrofocusing and limitations in reliable quantification (Bunai & Yamane, 2005;Speers & Wu, 2007). Some of these disadvantages have been overcome with new techniques based on improved solubilizing agents or isotopic labelling (Couté et al, 2007;Speers & Wu, 2007), expanding the possibilities for analysing bacterial membrane subproteomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results obtained by global solution-based, multidimensional shotgun investigations suggest that 16 O/ 18 O labeling is a reliable and powerful tool for comparative proteomics and offers significant advantages over the 2D-PAGE-based comparative proteomics by allowing unbiased proteome coverage [33] and high analytical throughput [34]. It is important to stress that relative changes in protein concentrations obtained by shotgun proteomics depict changes in protein abundances only at a given point in time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent studies on the E. coli membrane proteins have optimized this sample preparation method, enabling 394 membrane proteins to be identified (Fountoulakis and Gasser, 2003). Following this milestone in examining bacterial membrane proteins using 2-DE, many Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial membranes proteomes, such as those from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Campylobacter jejuni, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus have been investigated (Nouwens et al, 2002;Bunai and Yamane, 2005;Gatlin et al, 2006;Poetsch and Wolters, 2008). Membrane proteins are often highly immunogenic, and have been investigated in search of potential vaccine targets.…”
Section: Membrane Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%