1991
DOI: 10.1080/08923649109526759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness and costs of distance education using computer‐mediated communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Institutional issues must be considered and discussed as an educational organization begins to focus on online education (Phelps, Wells, Ashworth, & Hahn, 1991). Foremost must be recognition (perhaps in the promotion and tenure process) for faculty, but others might be by offering release time and assistance.…”
Section: Institutional Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutional issues must be considered and discussed as an educational organization begins to focus on online education (Phelps, Wells, Ashworth, & Hahn, 1991). Foremost must be recognition (perhaps in the promotion and tenure process) for faculty, but others might be by offering release time and assistance.…”
Section: Institutional Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the three studies that compared distance and resident learners reported by Barry and Ryan using Army participants: (a) Hahn (1990), using Air Combat Command (ACC), found no differences between distance and resident trainees, (b) Phelps, Wells, Ashworth, and Hahn (1991), using a Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) system, also found no differences, and (c) Keene and Cary (1992) showed a benefit for distance learners over resident learners in using interactive video teleconferencing training. A fourth study by Bramble and Martin (1995) found that community colleges could provide adequate training for the military when using the U.S. Army's two-way audio/video Teletraining Network.…”
Section: Distance Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that were carried out up to the mid-nineties reach the conclusion that cost efficiency of distance courses is comparable to face-to-face approaches, yet not significantly higher [1], [33], [36]. Later studies, however, seem to be more definite about cost efficiency In these it is well clarified that cost efficiency in distance courses is well above cost efficiency of those delivered in a face-to-face approach [37], [33], [31], [38], [17].…”
Section: B the Proposed Framementioning
confidence: 99%