2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00380-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness and costs of chemical versus electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed that after 8 hours, one extra bed-day would be incurred at a cost of £338 [the excess bed-day cost for an elective inpatient stay for Healthcare Resource Group (HRG) EB07I 109 ]. For comparison, a randomised trial of cardioversion 196 reported a mean length of stay of 1 day (SD = 2) for 72 patients randomised to an initial PCV strategy, and 2 days (SD = 2) for 67 randomised to initial ECV.…”
Section: Sources Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed that after 8 hours, one extra bed-day would be incurred at a cost of £338 [the excess bed-day cost for an elective inpatient stay for Healthcare Resource Group (HRG) EB07I 109 ]. For comparison, a randomised trial of cardioversion 196 reported a mean length of stay of 1 day (SD = 2) for 72 patients randomised to an initial PCV strategy, and 2 days (SD = 2) for 67 randomised to initial ECV.…”
Section: Sources Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the high prevalence of AF, few studies have been performed to evaluate the overall cost of care for AF patients in clinical practice. The majority of the economic studies on AF estimate the costs of specific treatments such as ablation, anticoagulation, electrical cardioversion or several pharmacological treatments [9–13]. Studies examining the cost of disease in patients with AF have been conducted in the UK, France, and the USA [14–16] but because of differing health‐care and compensation systems, the transferability of national cost evaluations is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23] No difference between the two types of cardioversions has been found regarding the efÞ cacy to restore sinus rhythm and other issues (i.e., incidence of thromboembolism and MANAGEMENT OF NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION stroke). [20,24] As outlined by the current guidelines, [7] patients who have been in AF for less than 48 hours are eligible for early cardioversion, while patients who have been in AF for more than 48 hours should be considered for anticoagulation therapy and elective cardioversion. All the strategies require appropriate administration of antithrombotic therapy to reduce the risk of stroke and other thromboembolic events.…”
Section: Classification Of Atrial Fibrillationmentioning
confidence: 99%