2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1413-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a very brief physical activity intervention delivered in NHS Health Checks (VBI Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: BackgroundPhysical activity interventions that are targeted at individuals can be effective in encouraging people to be more physically active. However, most such interventions are too long or complex and not scalable to the general population. This trial will test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a very brief physical activity intervention when delivered as part of preventative health checks in primary care (National Health Service (NHS) Health Check).Methods/designThe Very Brief Intervention (VBI)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This provided 80% power to detect a 0.2-SD ('small') difference in mean activity between groups (40 cpm), based on the SD of 200 cpm estimated in our preliminary trial [13] (alpha = 0.05, two-sided test). As attrition was lower than anticipated at 15%, we could recruit fewer participants in accordance with our protocol [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This provided 80% power to detect a 0.2-SD ('small') difference in mean activity between groups (40 cpm), based on the SD of 200 cpm estimated in our preliminary trial [13] (alpha = 0.05, two-sided test). As attrition was lower than anticipated at 15%, we could recruit fewer participants in accordance with our protocol [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted our analyses according to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines (S1 Table) and agreed the analysis plan a priori with the independent Trial Steering Committee [14]. We used analysis of covariance to test for intervention effects on continuous outcomes and quantified these with differences in means and 95% CIs, adjusting for primary care practice, sex, and age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations