Effectiveness and Comfort Assessment of the Novel Intra-oral Bisecting Angle Bisector© and Paralleling RINN® Digital Imaging Receptor Holders in Low Palatal Height Patients

Satmi, Afaf Syahira Ahmad; Fadilah, Nurkamilya Halimah; Yusof, Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd; Manan, Nor Fazli Adull; Mahmud, Jamaluddin; Abdullah, Sukarnur Che

doi:10.21315/aos2020.15.1.401

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Diagnostic accuracy (e.g., root fractures, implant misfits) P tech [11,14] Bone level measurement for digital subtraction radiography P tech [20] Tooth length/root length/crown-root ratio estimation P tech [4,10,27,29,30] No difference [12] Periapical lesion size measurement P tech [24] No difference [23] Visibility of incisive foramen P tech [7] Radiation dose absorbed by thyroid and other organs P tech [19,25,26] Practice preference (from four survey studies) P tech [17,21,22] B tech [8] Radiographic error rate/reject rate P tech [13,15,18,31] B tech (for low palatal height) [9] The risk of bias assessment is summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Most of the studies were good quality case series, except that many of them did not explicitly mention if consecutive cases were examined.…”

Section: Key Practical Considerations/clinical Indications Preferred ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Performance of Paralleling Technique and Bisecting Angle Technique for Taking Periapical Radiographs: A Systematic Review

Yen

Yeung

2023

Dentistry Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Periapical radiography is a routine radiographic procedure performed by dentists on a daily basis. It can be taken with two techniques, the paralleling technique (P tech) and the bisecting angle technique (B tech). This systematic review aimed to identify the relevant literature, compare the use of P and B techs across various dental specialties, and determine the most appropriate technique to be used for different purposes in taking periapical radiographs. In January 2023, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar to identify the studies that compared the two radiographic techniques. The search string was: (paralleling AND (“bisecting angle” OR “bisected angle”)). Manual reference tracing was also performed to identify the studies potentially missed. After screening, 26 studies were included for the qualitative review. The 26 included studies were published between 1976 and 2021. Ten of the studies were about general dentistry (dental radiology in general applications), whereas another ten studies were related to endodontics, such as working length estimation. Most studies advocated the use of the P tech for general, endodontics, implantology, and other indications. B tech was advocated for patients with a low palatal height. More future studies are needed to evaluate their performance in different scenarios with standardized equipment and radiographic positioning.

show abstract

Section: Key Practical Considerations/clinical Indications Preferred ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Performance of Paralleling Technique and Bisecting Angle Technique for Taking Periapical Radiographs: A Systematic Review

Yen

Yeung

2023

Dentistry Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effectiveness and Comfort Assessment of the Novel Intra-oral Bisecting Angle Bisector© and Paralleling RINN® Digital Imaging Receptor Holders in Low Palatal Height Patients

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

The Performance of Paralleling Technique and Bisecting Angle Technique for Taking Periapical Radiographs: A Systematic Review

The Performance of Paralleling Technique and Bisecting Angle Technique for Taking Periapical Radiographs: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About