2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ascom.2020.100437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectively using unsupervised machine learning in next generation astronomical surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…umap is commonly used for visualising high-dimensional spaces in both computer science and astronomy (e.g. Clarke et al 2020;Reis et al 2021).…”
Section: Visualisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…umap is commonly used for visualising high-dimensional spaces in both computer science and astronomy (e.g. Clarke et al 2020;Reis et al 2021).…”
Section: Visualisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that our approach could be used to robustly filter out bad images at the pipeline level, in addition to identifying scientifically interesting anomalies in postprocessing. We built a custom visualization tool to interactively explore the UMAP space in more detail, based on a similar tool by Reis et al (2021); it can be accessed at https://weirdgalaxi.es. We used this tool to perform a search for scientifically interesting anomalies; the results of this search are described in Section 4.5.…”
Section: Characterization Of Anomalies With the Wgan Cae And Umapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former are concerned with extracting patterns from a data set without direct guidance in the form of labeled data, while the latter focus on learning a function from labeled examples to carry out classification or regression. Examples of the former are anomaly detection (Protopapas et al 2006;Baron & Poznanski 2017;Giles & Walkowicz 2020), clustering (e.g., Pasquato & Chung 2019), dimensionality reduction (e.g., Reis et al 2018), and even integrated approaches including interactive visualization (Reis et al 2021). While we do not discuss supervised methods in the following (nor even unsupervised methods except for SOM), we point the interested reader to two relevant reviews: Ball & Brunner (2010) and the more recent Baron (2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%