Effectively Incorporating Small Reserves into National Systems of Protected and Conserved Areas

Abstract

Received wisdom has argued that large protected areas are superior to small reserves, based on island biogeography theory, economies of scale, and the need to sustain viable populations of top predators and other large ranging or dispersive species. But this position overlooks evidence that, for many species, strategically placed smaller reserves are extremely important, especially in areas highly altered by humans. Many countries are reluctant or unable to designate additional large protected areas. We provide evidence that carefully designed support networks of smaller protected areas can be an important complement to activities to reach the Global Biodiversity Framework’s target of 30% of the planet in protected and conserved areas by 2030. We identify seven benefits from small reserves, when correctly located and well-managed: (1) conserving critical habitat of range-limited or relic species; (2) conserving remaining areas of sensitive or threatened habitat in altered ecosystems; (3) conserving habitat for sensitive, time-limited lifecycle stages, such as raptor nesting sites and fish spawning grounds; (4) maintaining and enabling connectivity by providing stepping stones of suitable habitat through inhospitable ecosystems; (5) providing increased protection for critical habitat within Category V protected landscapes and seascapes to boost their overall conservation potential; (6) taking advantage of conservation opportunities at cultural sites, sacred natural sites, and other faith-based sites in transformed landscapes; (7) integrating different management approaches and governance types in a range of connected small reserves to multiply conservation impacts. We propose a typology based on these benefits that can guide steps for policy makers to help plan and monitor small reserves in area-based conservation efforts. Using these principles, the role of small reserves in area-based conservation efforts can be further enhanced.

Enhancing in Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives for Food and Agriculture in Lithuania

“…16.6 species per 3.9 ha on average (see Supplementary data, Table S3), compared to 17.8 species per grid cell 4×4 km in protected areas (Table 6 below). It has been reported that small reserves allow to take advantage of conservation opportunities provided by cultural sites, sacred natural sites, and other faith-based sites in otherwise transformed landscapes (Dudley et al 2024). And that is the case in the current study as 30 potential CWR reserve sites were identi ed in the ancient hillfort sites.…”