2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectively improving the accuracy of PBE functional in calculating the solid band gap via machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation strength of the predictions based on the PBE band gaps ( R 2 = 0.762 for the test set and R 2 = 0.964 for the training set) is similar to the correlation strength obtained from the HSE shift ( R 2 = 0.797 for the test set and R 2 = 0.971 for the training set). This relationship transforms the range of band gaps from 0.2 to 2.0 eV with PBE to 0.5–2.5 eV with the corrected HSE band gaps, which is similar to the effect seen when transforming from PBE to the corrected band gap when studying a variety of materials . The MAE for the HSE vs PBE band gaps using this method has an MAE of 0.157 eV in comparison to simple linear regression with an MAE of 0.200 eV, which is comparable to the improvement seen with neural networks …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correlation strength of the predictions based on the PBE band gaps ( R 2 = 0.762 for the test set and R 2 = 0.964 for the training set) is similar to the correlation strength obtained from the HSE shift ( R 2 = 0.797 for the test set and R 2 = 0.971 for the training set). This relationship transforms the range of band gaps from 0.2 to 2.0 eV with PBE to 0.5–2.5 eV with the corrected HSE band gaps, which is similar to the effect seen when transforming from PBE to the corrected band gap when studying a variety of materials . The MAE for the HSE vs PBE band gaps using this method has an MAE of 0.157 eV in comparison to simple linear regression with an MAE of 0.200 eV, which is comparable to the improvement seen with neural networks …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This relationship transforms the range of band gaps from 0.2 to 2.0 eV with PBE to 0.5−2.5 eV with the corrected HSE band gaps, which is similar to the effect seen when transforming from PBE to the corrected band gap when studying a variety of materials. 63 The MAE for the HSE vs PBE band gaps using this method has an MAE of 0.157 eV in comparison to simple linear regression with an MAE of 0.200 eV, which is comparable to the improvement seen with neural networks. 64 Materials Descriptors.…”
Section: ■ Summarymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The decrease matches qualitatively with the change of band gap detected using UV–vis DRS. It is well-known that PBE cannot quantitatively reproduce band gaps due to its inherent limitations …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Computational design of materials has become an essential part of PV design. [15][16][17] By using computational methods, researchers can simulate and predict the performance of different materials and devices without costly and time-consuming experimental trials. Such methodology can greatly accelerate the materials design and device optimization process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%