2017
DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in premonitoring admission to capture seizures during limited video‐EEG monitoring

Abstract: SummaryObjectiveWithdrawal of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is commonly applied to capture seizures in video‐EEG (vEEG) monitoring for patients with infrequent but intractable seizures. Because of the half‐life of AEDs, AED withdrawal during only vEEG tends to be inadequate to provoke seizures within the vEEG admission. We hypothesize that prewithdrawal of long‐half‐life AEDs in premonitoring admission (PMA) is safe and effective to capture seizures in the limited time of vEEG. We determined the effect of half‐li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In clinical practice, AED discontinuation is required during a long EEG monitoring period to enhance the rate of successful diagnostics [ 7 ] and to precisely defining the epileptogenic zone [ 26 , 27 ]. However, an important concern is that few guidelines on AED withdrawal during a lengthy stay in EEG monitoring have been published [ 8 ], so the outcome might be doubly uncertain. Indeed, this procedure may trigger secondarily generalized tonic-clonic SRSs, SRS clustering, and status epilepticus in patients [ 9 , 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In clinical practice, AED discontinuation is required during a long EEG monitoring period to enhance the rate of successful diagnostics [ 7 ] and to precisely defining the epileptogenic zone [ 26 , 27 ]. However, an important concern is that few guidelines on AED withdrawal during a lengthy stay in EEG monitoring have been published [ 8 ], so the outcome might be doubly uncertain. Indeed, this procedure may trigger secondarily generalized tonic-clonic SRSs, SRS clustering, and status epilepticus in patients [ 9 , 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In epileptic patients who are candidates for surgical treatment, the rapid discontinuation of AEDs is required during the presurgical evaluation of video-electroencephalogram (v-EEG) monitoring [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. However, this procedure can trigger the so-called “rebound effect”, which is characterized by transient seizure generalization or even prolonged increase in frequency of partial seizures [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is well accepted to partially or totally withdraw AEDs in the EMU to precipitate seizures, more so as it is unlikely to influence the localizing significance of the recorded seizures [1][2][3][4][5]. AED withdrawal is typically associated with an increase in seizure frequency and generalization rate [6][7][8][9]. The increase in seizure frequency and generalized seizures correlates with the taper rate and is more pronounced for carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine than for other AEDs like phenytoin, valproate or lamotrigine [6,7,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients are admitted to the hospital on a Monday, and their discharge occurs on the following Saturday or Sunday. In the morning of the admission day, patients do not take the prescribed antiseizure drugs because drug discontinuation is required to precipitate seizures for VEEG monitoring [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Following the reintroduction of antiseizure drugs (usually on Wednesday or Thursday), patients remain in the hospital for 2 to 3 additional days, to ensure that drug plasma concentrations reach therapeutic levels.…”
Section: Patients and Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%