2015
DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i11.1553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective treatment strategies other than sorafenib for the patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma invading portal vein

Abstract: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accompanying portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) have relatively few therapeutic options and an extremely poor prognosis. These patients are classified into barcelona clinic liver cancer stage C and sorafenib is suggested as the standard therapy of care. However, overall survival (OS) gain from sorafenib is unsatisfactory and better treatment modalities are urgently required. Therefore, we critically appraised recent data for the various treatment strategies for pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper nodule size limit adopted at our center was chosen on the strength of previous experiences with percutaneous MWA, which achieved 75% of complete ablations in HCC up to 5 cm in size . VLA was used in 188 carefully selected patients with BCLC C: 122 of them were classified as such due to a PS 1, which we do not consider a contraindication to minimally invasive approaches; the other 66 had a type Vp1 portal thrombosis (of the peripheral branches) . The aim of VLA was to completely ablate the invaded area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The upper nodule size limit adopted at our center was chosen on the strength of previous experiences with percutaneous MWA, which achieved 75% of complete ablations in HCC up to 5 cm in size . VLA was used in 188 carefully selected patients with BCLC C: 122 of them were classified as such due to a PS 1, which we do not consider a contraindication to minimally invasive approaches; the other 66 had a type Vp1 portal thrombosis (of the peripheral branches) . The aim of VLA was to completely ablate the invaded area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…122 of them were classified as such due to a PS 1, which we do not consider a contraindication to minimally invasive approaches; the other 66 had a type Vp1 portal thrombosis (of the peripheral branches). 22,23 The aim of VLA was to completely ablate the invaded area. The available data on localized infiltrative HCC 24 or HCC with portal thrombosis being treated with percutaneous ablation indicate that the procedure is safe and that patient survival is longer than with no treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous models published, the inclusion of patients with portal vein tumour thrombosis (PVTT) represents the second concern . PVTT is generally considered a contraindication for TACE because of concerns that interruption to hepatic arterial blood supply could result in a massive hepatic necrosis in patients whose blood supply is already compromised . In addition, it is well known that vascular invasion is probably the most negative prognostic indicator in HCC prognosis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were trials attempting downstaging in these patients using TARE with Yttrium-90 or multimodal treatment with sorafenib, but the results were still not satisfactory. (15,16) The role of RT had been restricted in the past due to radiation-induced liver disease caused by low tolerance of the liver to radiation but after the introduction of CRT, excessive radiation exposure to the liver and adjacent organs could be avoided, and radiation treatment has become a safer treatment modality. (17,18) Despite the small number of patients, our data suggest the possible role of RT as a new treatment modality for downstaging patients with PVTT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%