1995
DOI: 10.2172/87080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective transmissivity of two-dimensional fracture networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The equivalent aperture for each fracture population is calculated using the generalized f ‐mean function given by btrue¯h3=f1()i=1nwifbnormalhi3 where n is the total number of fractures, w i = l i / l tot is the length‐based weight of the i th fracture, b h i is the hydraulic aperture of the i th fracture, and f = x , 1/ x , or ln( x ) corresponds to arithmetic, harmonic, or geometric mean, respectively. Arithmetic mean treats fractures as connected in parallel and tends to give an upper bound, while harmonic mean assumes fractures as connected in series and tends to provide a lower bound [ de Marsily , ; Zimmerman and Bodvarsson , ; Ronayne and Gorelick , ; Leung and Zimmerman , ]. Permeability of 2D heterogeneous media is more likely to be governed by the geometric mean of local fracture permeability that follows a lognormal or power law distribution [ de Marsily , ; de Dreuzy et al ., ].…”
Section: Multiscale Growth Network With Stress‐ and Scale‐dependent mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equivalent aperture for each fracture population is calculated using the generalized f ‐mean function given by btrue¯h3=f1()i=1nwifbnormalhi3 where n is the total number of fractures, w i = l i / l tot is the length‐based weight of the i th fracture, b h i is the hydraulic aperture of the i th fracture, and f = x , 1/ x , or ln( x ) corresponds to arithmetic, harmonic, or geometric mean, respectively. Arithmetic mean treats fractures as connected in parallel and tends to give an upper bound, while harmonic mean assumes fractures as connected in series and tends to provide a lower bound [ de Marsily , ; Zimmerman and Bodvarsson , ; Ronayne and Gorelick , ; Leung and Zimmerman , ]. Permeability of 2D heterogeneous media is more likely to be governed by the geometric mean of local fracture permeability that follows a lognormal or power law distribution [ de Marsily , ; de Dreuzy et al ., ].…”
Section: Multiscale Growth Network With Stress‐ and Scale‐dependent mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lattice models views the porous medium as a series of capillary networks superimposed on each other with different radius and density [16][17][18]. Discrete fracture networks also provide a solution to represent the effective conductivity of fractured rock at a grid-block scale [19]. Porous medium models which include some form of heterogeneity associated with a number of intrinsic characteristics (permeability, porosity) also seems to provide a solution to explain such behaviour [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bourbiaux et al (1998) also used the actual 3-D fracture network and, by applying a pressure gradient in each direction, calculated the equivalent FNP from incompressible steady-state flow. In addition to these numerical ones, semi-analytical approaches were also introduced (Hestir and Long 1990;Zimmerman and Bodvarsson 1996). In highly fractured and complex reservoirs, due to the higher number of required numerical nodes for computations, numerical approaches might demand relatively heavy computational efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%