2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective thermal conductivities in packed beds: Review of correlations and its influence on system performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, when the Bi is smaller than 1.0 (less than 1.05 in case 1), the deviation between model 1 and model 3 is less than 2%, and model 1 can accurately simulate the charging process of the PBTES system. This conclusion coincides with the investigation in Díaz-Heras et al 31 Besides, it is found from the numerical results of model 3 that the charging duration decreases when the diameter of the PCM capsule decreases, which is because that the heat transfer between the PCM capsules and HTF is enhanced with the reduction of the diameter of the PCM capsules, as shown by Equations ( 9) and (10). The model 2 considers the effect of temperature gradient inside the PCM capsule by introducing the thermal resistance, therefore the effective convective heat T A B L E 1 The numerical setting of the operating parameters of the PBTES system transfer coefficient, obtained by Equation ( 15) is adopted to evaluate the heat transfer, thus the results of model 2 show good agreement with those of model 3 at different Bi, which confirms the feasibility of model 2 at small Ste.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, when the Bi is smaller than 1.0 (less than 1.05 in case 1), the deviation between model 1 and model 3 is less than 2%, and model 1 can accurately simulate the charging process of the PBTES system. This conclusion coincides with the investigation in Díaz-Heras et al 31 Besides, it is found from the numerical results of model 3 that the charging duration decreases when the diameter of the PCM capsule decreases, which is because that the heat transfer between the PCM capsules and HTF is enhanced with the reduction of the diameter of the PCM capsules, as shown by Equations ( 9) and (10). The model 2 considers the effect of temperature gradient inside the PCM capsule by introducing the thermal resistance, therefore the effective convective heat T A B L E 1 The numerical setting of the operating parameters of the PBTES system transfer coefficient, obtained by Equation ( 15) is adopted to evaluate the heat transfer, thus the results of model 2 show good agreement with those of model 3 at different Bi, which confirms the feasibility of model 2 at small Ste.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“… hvol=6h()1εdp h=kfdpitalicNu=kfdp()2+1.1Re0.6Pr1/3 The heat transfer of the HTF includes heat conduction, radiation, and natural convection. These complex heat transfer processes are made equivalent to the heat conduction of the HTF using the effective thermal conductivity 31 which could be estimated by the formula summarized by Gonzo 32 kf,italiceff=kf1+2β3ϕ+()2β3+0.1βϕ2+0.05ϕ3exp()4.5β1italicβϕ where β = 1 − ε , ϕ = ( k p − k f )/( k p + 2 k f ) and k f is the thermal conductivity of the HTF.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…bau eff bau (18) The radiative effective conductivity is chosen from Sih and Barlow [26], as reviewed by Diaz-Heras [27].…”
Section: Description Of the Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equivalent capacitance (C ij ) could be computed by combining three capacitances using Eq. ( 6) [27].…”
Section: Heat Transfer Formulation In Dem and Cfdmentioning
confidence: 99%