2020
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/11/021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective theory of freeze-in dark matter

Abstract: We perform a model independent study of freeze-in of massive particle dark matter (DM) by adopting an effective field theory framework. Considering the dark matter to be a gauge singlet Majorana fermion, odd under a stabilising symmetry Z2 under which all standard model (SM) fields are even, we write down all possible DM-SM operators upto and including mass dimension eight. For simplicity of the numerical analysis we restrict ourselves only to the scalar operators in SM as well as in the dark sector. We calcul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value d = 4.5 divides two distinct regimes, and DM production is more efficient at high temperatures for d > 4.5. This case, where the interaction is non-renormalizable, is often referred to as UV freeze-in [43][44][45][46]. On the contrary, for renormalizable operators scatterings dominate over decays only if a larger number of scattering processes can contribute to DM production or when the mass splitting between B and X is small enough to suppress the decay rate (see e.g.…”
Section: Fimp Production From Scatterings and Uv Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value d = 4.5 divides two distinct regimes, and DM production is more efficient at high temperatures for d > 4.5. This case, where the interaction is non-renormalizable, is often referred to as UV freeze-in [43][44][45][46]. On the contrary, for renormalizable operators scatterings dominate over decays only if a larger number of scattering processes can contribute to DM production or when the mass splitting between B and X is small enough to suppress the decay rate (see e.g.…”
Section: Fimp Production From Scatterings and Uv Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we demonstrate the difference between massless and massive limit of DM production cross-section and therefore we will be able comment on limitations of the Ultra Violet (UV) freeze-in advocated in [50,82]. Here we limit ourself to the period before EWSB so all the SM particles are massless.…”
Section: Uv Limit and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…which we will use to find the relic density allowed parameter space of the model. Since in our case the connection between the dark and the visible sector proceeds via a non-renormalizable interaction, the DM abundance is usually characterized by UV freeze-in [50,82] limit, where the DM abundance is sensitive to the reheat temperature T RH of the universe and NP scale Λ only. This is in sharp contrast to the Infra-Red or IR freeze-in scenario where the two sectors communicate via renormalizable operators, and the DM abundance is set by the IR physics i.e.…”
Section: Jhep12(2020)162mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the strength of the DM gravitational interaction could be tiny enough that DM particles are feebly interacting massive particles (FIMP's) and, thus, the relic abundance of DM is set via the DM freeze-in production mechanism [27][28][29][30][31][32], instead (for a recent review see ref. [33]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%