Objectives: To examine the reliability and fall experience discrimination of the Cross Step moving on Four spots Test (CSFT) including a rapid crossover steps and the relationship between the CSFT scores and the fall-related physical function.Design: The reliability of the CSFT was examined in a test-retest format with the same tester. Results: The trial-to-trial reliability test indicated good reliability of the CSFT in both sexes (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.833 in men, 0.825 in women). However, trial-to-trial errors increased with increase in the CSFT values in both sexes. Significant correlations were observed between the CSFT values and scores for most fall-related physical function tests in both sexes. However, the correlation coefficient for all significant correlations was <0.5. Two-way analysis of variance (sex × fall experience) revealed that the fall experience is a 1 significant factor affecting the CSFT values; the values in fallers were significantly lower than those in nonfallers. The odds ratios in logistic regression analysis were significant in both sexes (men: 1.35, women: 1.48). As determined by Youden's index, the optimal cutoff value for identifying fall experience was 7.32 s, with an area under the curve of 0.676.
Conclusion:The CSFT can detect fall experience and is useful in the evaluation of different fall-related physical functions, including muscle strength, balance, and mobility.