1980
DOI: 10.1086/157617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective temperatures of late-type stars - The field giants from K0 to M6

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
120
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
17
120
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the difficulties involved in achieving milli-arcsecond resolution, that sample was almost entirely composed of giants with angular diameters measured via Lunar Occultations and Michelson Interferometry (T eff < 5000 K) or Intensity Interferometry (T eff > 6000 K). One of the intriguing results of that analysis was the impossibility of setting the same zero point of the absolute calibration using angular diameters measured by Lunar Occultations (White & Feierman 1987;Ridgway et al 1980) and Michelson Interferometry (Hutter et al 1989;di Benedetto & Rabbia 1987;Mozurkewich et al 1991) with those measured by Intensity Interferometry (Hanbury Brown et al 1974). The absolute calibration (in the Johnson system) proposed by Alonso et al (1994a) is a weighted average from their table 10 and it is interesting to notice that the one derived from Intensity Interferometry alone is 4.8 (J) 1.3 (H) and 4.0 (K) percent lower than the averaged, proposed one.…”
Section: Appendix A: Comparing the Tcs And 2mass Absolute Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the difficulties involved in achieving milli-arcsecond resolution, that sample was almost entirely composed of giants with angular diameters measured via Lunar Occultations and Michelson Interferometry (T eff < 5000 K) or Intensity Interferometry (T eff > 6000 K). One of the intriguing results of that analysis was the impossibility of setting the same zero point of the absolute calibration using angular diameters measured by Lunar Occultations (White & Feierman 1987;Ridgway et al 1980) and Michelson Interferometry (Hutter et al 1989;di Benedetto & Rabbia 1987;Mozurkewich et al 1991) with those measured by Intensity Interferometry (Hanbury Brown et al 1974). The absolute calibration (in the Johnson system) proposed by Alonso et al (1994a) is a weighted average from their table 10 and it is interesting to notice that the one derived from Intensity Interferometry alone is 4.8 (J) 1.3 (H) and 4.0 (K) percent lower than the averaged, proposed one.…”
Section: Appendix A: Comparing the Tcs And 2mass Absolute Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.1). -M dwarfs in our input catalogue with uncertain or probably incorrect spectral types based on apparent magnitudes, r − J colours, and heliocentric distances, including resolved spectral type and class, we also included approximately 50 stars with well-determined spectral types from K3 to M8 for both dwarf (Johnson & Morgan 1953;Kirkpatrick et al 1991;PMSU) and giant classes (e.g., Moore & Paddock 1950;Ridgway et al 1980;Jacoby et al 1984;García 1989;Keenan & McNeil 1989;Kirkpatrick et al 1991;Sánchez-Blázquez et al 2006;Jiménez-Esteban et al 2012). …”
Section: Cafos Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For S Ser we used the photometric diameter to interpret the MIDI data and the diameter corrected with the above law to interpret the K-band data. The spectral types were used to determine temperatures using effective temperature scales by Perrin et al (1998) and Ridgway et al (1980). The central star's diameters and temperatures are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Stellar Diameter and Temperature Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%