2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(02)00133-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective stress analyses of liquefaction-induced deformation in river dikes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Many types of river dikes and embankments have been analyzed through the strain space multiple shear mechanism model and mostly successful in reproducing the varying degree of crest settlements depending on the geotechnical condition of foundation (Ozutsumi et al, 2002;Tobita et al, 2006a). However, recent experience in analysis of one particular type of river dike, the dike No.1 of the Shiribeshi-Toshibeshi river, Hokkaido, Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Residual Strength Of Soil On Seismic Settlements Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many types of river dikes and embankments have been analyzed through the strain space multiple shear mechanism model and mostly successful in reproducing the varying degree of crest settlements depending on the geotechnical condition of foundation (Ozutsumi et al, 2002;Tobita et al, 2006a). However, recent experience in analysis of one particular type of river dike, the dike No.1 of the Shiribeshi-Toshibeshi river, Hokkaido, Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Residual Strength Of Soil On Seismic Settlements Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater discrepancies may therefore exist amongst LEP predictions in the assessment of silty sands and sandy silts, relative to evaluations of clean sands. Lastly, field, laboratory, and numerical analyses have suggested that high fines-content soils in the capping or interbedded non-liquefiable strata may inhibit surficial liquefaction manifestations [45,4,39]. Thus, inherent limitations in the LPI framework to account for such effects may lead to erroneous hazard assessments even if the selected LEP is wholly competent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the case of the soil column, parametric studies are conducted in order to explore the influence of the characteristics of the input motion, soil permeability and the thickness of the liquefiable layer on the failure mechanism. In fact, in the past several studies have been proven the crtical role of the influence of foundation soil type and earthquake characteristics [20,1,13,15].…”
Section: Dynamic Response Of the Leveementioning
confidence: 99%