2008
DOI: 10.1362/147539208x290398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective strategies for enhancing waste recycling rates in socially deprived areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some environmental researchers (e.g. Schultz et al, 1995;Williams and Taylor, 2004;Bennett et al, 2008) and local authorities (e.g. Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs, 2007) claimed that economic instruments are highly effective in increasing community participation in waste recycling, the effectiveness of the reward or incentive schemes in promoting domestic waste recycling is doubtful.…”
Section: Collectivism In Waste Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some environmental researchers (e.g. Schultz et al, 1995;Williams and Taylor, 2004;Bennett et al, 2008) and local authorities (e.g. Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs, 2007) claimed that economic instruments are highly effective in increasing community participation in waste recycling, the effectiveness of the reward or incentive schemes in promoting domestic waste recycling is doubtful.…”
Section: Collectivism In Waste Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Djiboutian authorities could establish systems that provide bonuses, and coupons to young people whenever they engage in environmental protection activities. Bennett (2008) identified how rewarding citizens for their positive activities such as waste disposal can increase the level of commitment to environmental protection, by injecting friendlier environmental behaviour. While others did not find any link between the Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review • Vol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researching exactly the same theme of reward effect, (Chung & Poon, 1996) found in their survey that respondents showed a willingness to return batteries if there was a refundable deposit. Whereas, Schultz et al (1995), Williams & Taylor (2004) and Bennett et al (2008), suggested that economic rewards, such as valuable instruments are strongly effective in boosting community engagement and participation in environmental protection. On the other hand, Allen et al (1993), investigated the reliability of coupons in stimulating aluminium recycling in the United States and could not find any association.…”
Section: Governmental Rewardmentioning
confidence: 99%