2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective staffing of projects for reconciling conflict between cost efficiency and quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recognizing who is a team member is critical as being familiar with each other is a key variable able to mitigate the performance detriments of team members who are spread too thin across multiple teams. Indeed, Choi et al (2021) demonstrated that team member familiarity can mitigate the trade-off multiteamers often have to make between cost-efficiency and the quality of work -knowing each other well enables members to rely on each other's strengths and weaknesses. Colicev et al (2023) demonstrated that while performance declines for all employees who are assigned to many teams, employee familiarity allows team members to exhibit higher performance at such high levels of MTM number.…”
Section: Identity Identification and Familiarity With Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recognizing who is a team member is critical as being familiar with each other is a key variable able to mitigate the performance detriments of team members who are spread too thin across multiple teams. Indeed, Choi et al (2021) demonstrated that team member familiarity can mitigate the trade-off multiteamers often have to make between cost-efficiency and the quality of work -knowing each other well enables members to rely on each other's strengths and weaknesses. Colicev et al (2023) demonstrated that while performance declines for all employees who are assigned to many teams, employee familiarity allows team members to exhibit higher performance at such high levels of MTM number.…”
Section: Identity Identification and Familiarity With Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For individual employees, MTM number has been reported to relate negatively (van de Brake et al., 2018 considering short‐term impact; Zika‐Viktorsson et al., 2006), positively (Li et al., 2020; van de Brake et al., 2020b; van de Brake et al., 2018 considering long‐term impact), curvilinearly (Chan, 2014; Colicev et al., 2023), and not (Rapp & Mathieu, 2019; van de Brake et al., 2020a) to effectiveness. Similarly, team‐level studies report a mix of positive (MTM number: Chan, 2014; Cummings & Haas, 2012; percentage of time: Cummings & Haas, 2012), negative (MTM number: Choi et al., 2021), curvilinear (MTM number: Bertolotti et al., 2015), and no relationships (MTM number: Carton & Cummings, 2013; Mortensen, 2014; van de Brake & Berger, 2023; percentage of time: Maynard et al., 2012; Mortensen, 2014; van de Brake & Berger, 2023). Finally, the few studies on MTM's effect on firm effectiveness show either a negative (Crawford et al., 2019) or curvilinear (Berger et al., 2022) relationship.…”
Section: Overview Of the Relationship Between Multiple Team Membershi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The worldwide popularity and acceptance of the "iron triangle" [24], identifying time, quality, and costs as the three key criteria to measure success in project and construction management, gives credence to the critical and potentially leading role cost estimation plays in construction. Cost is considered the most critical measure of performance [25] from a stakeholder's perspective and is used as a measure of efficiency [26]. Yet, a commonality in construction projects is a shortfall in cost performance, the leading cause of cost overruns.…”
Section: -Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choi et al (2021) compared staffing policies in a cost-efficiency–quality trade-off problem. Choi et al (2021) proposed countervailing hypotheses and empirically examine to compare the influence of team familiarity and multi-teaming on trade-off between cost-efficiency-quality problems. Results provided practical suggestions for an effective staff management.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%