2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective rocker shapes used by able-bodied persons for walking and fore-aft swaying: Implications for design of ankle–foot prostheses

Abstract: The use of rocker models to understand functional tasks of the human lower limb is attractive because of their simplicity. Recent studies have determined a consistent feature of able-bodied walking termed the roll-over shape (ROS), which is the effective rocker shape that the lower limb system conforms to between initial contact and contralateral initial contact during walking. However, it is unclear what effective rocker shapes are used for fore-aft swaying. A better understanding of these shapes could be use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These interpretations are essentially kinematic, and they represent early efforts to describe the complex interplay between foot geometry and limb dynamics. Ankle-foot interplay is not yet fully understood (Zelik et al, 2015b), but is the subject of active research in theoretical biomechanics (Adamczyk and Kuo, 2013;Adamczyk et al, 2006;Hansen and Wang, 2010;Hansen et al, 2004;Ruina et al, 2005;Srinivasan et al, 2009), as well as in applied domains such as prosthetics (Barocio et al, 2014;Boone et al, 2013;Curtze et al, 2011;Hansen and Childress, 2010;Hansen et al, 2006) and orthotics (Fatone and Hansen, 2007;Fatone et al, 2009;Vanderpool et al, 2008). Because the aforementioned kinematic perspectives do not directly address the question of what happens to the large burst of ankle push-off power, they are not amenable to the energy/work analysis and interpretation provided here.…”
Section: Alternative Perspectives On Ankle Push-offmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interpretations are essentially kinematic, and they represent early efforts to describe the complex interplay between foot geometry and limb dynamics. Ankle-foot interplay is not yet fully understood (Zelik et al, 2015b), but is the subject of active research in theoretical biomechanics (Adamczyk and Kuo, 2013;Adamczyk et al, 2006;Hansen and Wang, 2010;Hansen et al, 2004;Ruina et al, 2005;Srinivasan et al, 2009), as well as in applied domains such as prosthetics (Barocio et al, 2014;Boone et al, 2013;Curtze et al, 2011;Hansen and Childress, 2010;Hansen et al, 2006) and orthotics (Fatone and Hansen, 2007;Fatone et al, 2009;Vanderpool et al, 2008). Because the aforementioned kinematic perspectives do not directly address the question of what happens to the large burst of ankle push-off power, they are not amenable to the energy/work analysis and interpretation provided here.…”
Section: Alternative Perspectives On Ankle Push-offmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of a kinetic shape range from rehabilitation devices [16] to the design of roll over shapes for prosthetics [17,18].…”
Section: The Kinetic Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other work has shown that the physiologic ankle-foot system conforms to a much flatter effective rocker shape during standing and fore-aft swaying (radius ~2 times leg length) [8]. The radii of the effective ankle-foot rocker shapes during walking and standing/ swaying are interesting when considered in a rocker inverted pendulum model of the human body, such as the one proposed by Gard and Childress [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis by Hansen and Wang found that a passive prosthetic ankle would require dramatically different torsional stiffness to mimic the effective rocker shapes achieved by neural control of the nondisabled ankle-foot system for walking and standing tasks [8]. This behavior would be difficult to achieve in a passive mechanical prosthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation