Effective Remedies for Third Country Nationals in EU Law: Justice Accessible to All?

Brouwer, E.R.

doi:10.1163/157181605775213137

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This meeting provided the basis for the European Commission's Hague Programme -a strategic plan "for freedom, justice and security" in the Community area. There is some concern that this new programme took over the Tampere's principle of "access to justice for all" and pretty much limited it to civil and criminal regulations (Brouwer 2005). There are risks of continuing securitization in migration policy-making (Sasse 2005).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the other hand, the Directive allows for a long list of administrative requirements regarding the length of the stay, sources of income, family members, health insurance and criminal record; and it does not mention who shall bear the expenses throughout the application process, nor in case of initiating a legal dispute of the official decision. This is a matter of high concern according to authors such as Brouwer (2005) and Cholewinski (2005) due to the risk of discrimination that it entails. In particular, the draft Directive produced by the European Commission was much clearer in protecting the applicants from expenses that they may not be able to cover.…”

Section: The Directivementioning

confidence: 99%

“…12 concerning the protection against expulsion for long-term residents excludes citizens who are considered to represent a public threat. As observed by Brouwer (2005), the drafting process was simultaneous to a significant progress on data surveillance networks, such as the Schengen Information System, the Eurodac fingerprint database and the Visa Information System. The Directive allows member states to refuse or withdraw longterm resident status based on information collected in these networks.…”

Section: The Directivementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

WE WILL ALWAYS HAVE TAMPERE: A Case Study on the Regulation of the Residence Status of Long-Term Migrants

Abrantes¹

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While European Union citizenship gradually moved from a matter of employmentrights toward a matter of fundamental rights, the status of third-country nationals (TCNs)remained locked in the policy areas of security and economic cooperation. This changed sincethe late-1990s under gradual developments favouring the centralization of migration policy. Thecurrent paper makes a contribution to trace this process by presenting a case study of the 2003Directive concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents. Anoverview of the process leading to the adoption of the Directive is followed by an examination ofthe practicalities involved in its transposition into domestic law in Portugal, a country in whichthe relative novelty of the immigration phenomenon and an inconstant economic trajectory arecritically entwined. It is concluded that migration policy can be developed at the EU level withouta common position on integration being taken. Far from an incidental outcome, this enablesnation-states to both concede benefits claimed through political mobilization for theadvancement of immigrants’ rights and reassert their gate-keeping capacity in the regulation ofmigration. The combination of protective advancements for TCNs and increased securitizationof their mobility stands out as a piece of key explanatory value to understand the adoption of theDirective in a context of tightening immigration policy in various member-states.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Directivementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Directivementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

WE WILL ALWAYS HAVE TAMPERE: A Case Study on the Regulation of the Residence Status of Long-Term Migrants

Abrantes¹

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many -often legal -experts of immigration policies have pointed out the legal problems with immigration policies in the EU, mainly far reaching discretionary powers of migration authorities, legal uncertainty and the absence of effective and substantive judicial review of exclusion measures (Adam and Devillard, 2008, pp. 33-34 and p. 44;Brouwer, 2005;Cholewinski, 2005;Staples, 2003, pp. 225-228;Oosterom-Staples, 2009 ).…”

Section: Bas Schotelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Disciplining the Transnational Mobility of People

Geiger¹,

Pécoud²

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global political economy is in flux as a series of cumulative crises impacts its organization and governance. The IPE series has tracked its development in both analysis and structure over the last three decades. It has always had a concentration on the global South. Now the South increasingly challenges the North as the centre of development, also reflected in a growing number of submissions and publications on indebted Eurozone economies in Southern Europe.An indispensable resource for scholars and researchers, the series examines a variety of capitalisms and connections by focusing on emerging economies, companies and sectors, debates and policies. It informs diverse policy communities as the established trans-Atlantic North declines and 'the rest', especially the BRICS, rise.

show abstract

“…Mais bien que tous les pays de l'UE ou presque se soient abstenus de déclarer officiellement une situation d'urgence ou l'état d'exception, le climat sociétal envers les migrants et les étrangers, notamment ceux qui sont originaires de pays islamiques, a amené de nombreux milieux politiques à soutenir la position des États-Unis, en particulier ceux qui y ont vu un moyen de justifier des mesures plus générales à l'encontre des migrants et des réfugiés (Palidda, 2006(Palidda, et 2007aOrtuno Aix et fernandez Bessa, 2006 ;Lock, 2006 ;Balzacq et Carrera, 2005). La suspicion est alors apparue également comme synonyme de pratiques illibérales spécifiques, bien que des juges, des avocats et des ONG soient parvenus dans une certaine mesure à contester ouvertement ce qui se passait (Brouwer, 2005 ;Szikinger et Tóth, 2006). Dans ce cas, il n'y a pas eu convergence entre la suspicion et le superpatriotisme ; c'est ainsi que le gouvernement Aznar, qui s'était efforcé d'imiter la stratégie de Bush pour mobiliser le pays, a subi une grave défaite électorale (fernandez Bessa et Ortuno Aix, 2006 ;Carrera, 2006a).…”

Section: Logique De Suspicion Et Pratiques D'exceptionunclassified

L'évolution du paysage européen en matière de liberté et de sécurité : rapport à mi-parcours sur le projet challenge

Bigo¹,

Carrera²,

Guild³

et al. 2011

Revue Internationale Des Sciences Sociales

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour Érès. © Érès. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays.La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Il est précisé que son stockage dans une base de données est également interdit.

show abstract

Effective Remedies for Third Country Nationals in EU Law: Justice Accessible to All?

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

WE WILL ALWAYS HAVE TAMPERE: A Case Study on the Regulation of the Residence Status of Long-Term Migrants

WE WILL ALWAYS HAVE TAMPERE: A Case Study on the Regulation of the Residence Status of Long-Term Migrants

Disciplining the Transnational Mobility of People

L'évolution du paysage européen en matière de liberté et de sécurité : rapport à mi-parcours sur le projet challenge

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About