2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective porosity of paddy soils as an estimation of its saturated hydraulic conductivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The attribute score of agricultural land was supposed to be high, because the land surfaces of the agriculture lands are covered by water during the cultivation period, which results in continuous infiltration. However, the hardpan layer located 20-40 cm under the surface of the paddy fields reduces soil leakage and makes it difficult for water to infiltrate into the aquifer [27][28][29][30]. Therefore, the contribution of agriculture land to the groundwater recharge is moderate, and the estimated attribute score is reasonable.…”
Section: Calibration Results For the Rpamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attribute score of agricultural land was supposed to be high, because the land surfaces of the agriculture lands are covered by water during the cultivation period, which results in continuous infiltration. However, the hardpan layer located 20-40 cm under the surface of the paddy fields reduces soil leakage and makes it difficult for water to infiltrate into the aquifer [27][28][29][30]. Therefore, the contribution of agriculture land to the groundwater recharge is moderate, and the estimated attribute score is reasonable.…”
Section: Calibration Results For the Rpamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is indispensable in the assessment of the processes of infiltration, irrigation and drainage (Aimrun et al, 2004). K s is one of the most sensitive input parameters for distributed hydrological models (Wang et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Carman (1939) expected that t would only have a narrow range of values. The relationship between soil porosity and hydraulic conductivity is often described by an empirical power law (Ahuja et al, 1989;Aminrun et al, 2004;Green et al, 2003):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahuja et al (1989) recommend À33 kPa whereas Aminrun et al (2004) suggest that a more negative value of À66 kPa may work better for soil with higher clay content. Han et al (2008) estimated f e from the point of inflexion of the water retention curve, which was determined from a fit of the Van Genuchten function (van Genuchten, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%