2012
DOI: 10.3368/er.30.4.329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Placement of Road Mitigation Using Lessons Learned from Turtle Crossing Signs in Ontario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the adult stage is often the most important stage for λ of long‐lived species (Heppell 1998), we explored the effects of increased adult survival. Although road barriers (Woltz et al 2008, Heaven et al 2019), creation of nesting areas (Buhlmann and Osborn 2011, Geller 2012), turtle crossing signs on roadways (Gunson and Schueler 2012), and removing predators (Fordham et al 2007) are commonly used methods for reducing adult mortality, there are no estimates of their overall effects on adult survival. Consequently, we increased adult survival at 2% increments to explore the effects of adult‐focused management actions in conjunction with nest protection while assuming our most ideal scenarios for head‐starting (i.e., 75% hatchlings head‐started, and high head‐start juvenile survival rate; Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the adult stage is often the most important stage for λ of long‐lived species (Heppell 1998), we explored the effects of increased adult survival. Although road barriers (Woltz et al 2008, Heaven et al 2019), creation of nesting areas (Buhlmann and Osborn 2011, Geller 2012), turtle crossing signs on roadways (Gunson and Schueler 2012), and removing predators (Fordham et al 2007) are commonly used methods for reducing adult mortality, there are no estimates of their overall effects on adult survival. Consequently, we increased adult survival at 2% increments to explore the effects of adult‐focused management actions in conjunction with nest protection while assuming our most ideal scenarios for head‐starting (i.e., 75% hatchlings head‐started, and high head‐start juvenile survival rate; Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate collision occurrence in MVC hotspots, we recommend the installation of appropriate wildlife warning signage at each MVC hotspot; such signs have since been installed at MVC hotspots in our study area. Highway sites with slightly fewer MVCs could also be considered for sign installation, but such decisions should weigh site-specific collision risk with the overall number of signs erected along highways in a region and the tendency of drivers to become desensitized to signs when commonplace (Al-Ghamdi andAlGadhi 2004, Gunson andSchueler 2012).…”
Section: Summary and Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although wildlife crossing signs are becoming ubiquitous across the landscape, their effectiveness at reducing road mortality is largely untested (Glista, DeVault, & DeWoody, 2009); however, a study on freshwater turtles showed that they did not decrease road mortality in Ontario (Seburn & McCurdy‐Adams, 2019). Additionally, research suggests that any positive impact they do have on driver behavior can be reduced by factors such as vandalism and placement within actual wildlife‐vehicle collision (WVC) hotspots (Gunson & Schueler, 2012). Conversely, measures that have been shown to reduce WVCs, such as overpasses, underpasses, and fencing, are more uncommon and are less likely to be incorporated into road construction projects, likely due to their prohibitive costs (Glista et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%