Proceedings 20th IEEE International Parallel &Amp; Distributed Processing Symposium 2006
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2006.1639361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective out-of-core parallel Delaunay mesh refinement using off-the-shelf software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On SMP nodes, the OHPDR (listed as OHPDR2) performs slightly worse. This is the opposite of the results we have seen on another system [Kot et al 2006]. It is likely due to smaller cache (per core) and/or different implementations of MPI and OpenMP.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationcontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…On SMP nodes, the OHPDR (listed as OHPDR2) performs slightly worse. This is the opposite of the results we have seen on another system [Kot et al 2006]. It is likely due to smaller cache (per core) and/or different implementations of MPI and OpenMP.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationcontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…There are many implementations of parallel graph algorithms on a variety of architectures, including distributedmemory supercomputers [30], shared-memory supercomputers [1], and multicore machines [16]. DMR in particular has been extensively studied in sequential [6], multicore [3] and distributedmemory settings [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the parallel Delaunay mesh generation methods that are directly related to this work, there are many more classes of parallel mesh generation methods: (1) octree/quadtree based methods [de Cougny et al 1994;Löhner and Cebral 1999;Rypl and Bittnar 2001], (2) edge-subdivision based methods [Jones and Plassmann 1994;Rivara et al 2006], and (3) a class of parallel out-of-core methods [Isenburg et al 2006;Kot et al 2006]. In [Isenburg et al 2006] the authors compute a billion triangle mesh on a laptop in 48 minutes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%