We have analyzed chemotaxis of neutrophil-differentiated HL60 cells in microfluidic devices that create exponential gradients of the chemoattractant, f-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLP). Such gradients expose each cell to a difference in fMLP concentration (⌬C) across its diameter that is directly proportional to the ambient concentration (C) at that cell's position in the gradient, so the ratio ⌬C/C is constant everywhere. Cells exposed to ambient fMLP concentrations near the constant of dissociation (K d) for fMLP binding to its receptor (Ϸ10 nM) crawl much less frequently when ⌬C/C is 0.05 than when it is 0.09 or 0.13. Hence, cells can detect the gradient across their diameter without moving and, thus, without experiencing temporal changes in attractant concentration. At all ⌬C/C ratios tested, the average chemotactic prowess of individual cells (indicated by the distance a cell traveled in the correct direction divided by the length of its migration path) is maximal for cells that start migrating at concentrations near the K d and progressively decreases at higher or lower starting concentrations. chemoattractant ͉ gradient ͉ neutrophils A n essential property of eukaryotic cells is their ability to orient in response to spatial cues. Only by correctly interpreting spatial changes in external stimuli can yeast cells mate, soil amoebae form spores, progeny of a fertilized egg form an organism, or neutrophils crawl toward their prey. Cells are known to respond to gradients of external stimuli such as chemoattractants, but how they sense and interpret gradients remains mysterious. The mystery goes beyond our ignorance of the biochemical basis of gradient sensing. More fundamentally, we have not even definitively identified the external cues sensed and interpreted by the cells and the respective roles of these cues in determining their responses to gradients.Bacteria migrate up gradients of chemoattractants, in a process called chemotaxis. Chemotaxing bacteria assess gradients temporally, by moving through the attractant concentration field, sensing the local ambient concentration, comparing the concentration at a given moment with concentrations at previous times, and changing swimming behavior accordingly (1). It has been proposed that the larger cells of eukaryotes, in contrast, sense gradients at a given moment by comparing attractant concentrations at different positions on their surfaces and thus orient themselves to crawl in the up-gradient direction by interpreting the spatial cues present in their location at that moment. In other words, such cells assess the gradient spatially and respond to purely spatial cues by directed chemotactic migration. It has been shown that both neutrophils (2) and Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae (3) can sense relatively steep gradients of chemoattractant, supplied by a micropipette, without moving and therefore without comparing ambient concentrations in different locations. In both cases, immobile cells, paralyzed by treatments that block actin polymerization, accumulate phosphatidylino...