2018
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Network Size Predicted From Simulations of Pathogen Outbreaks Through Social Networks Provides a Novel Measure of Structure-Standardized Group Size

Abstract: The transmission of infectious disease through a population is often modeled assuming that interactions occur randomly in groups, with all individuals potentially interacting with all other individuals at an equal rate. However, it is well known that pairs of individuals vary in their degree of contact. Here, we propose a measure to account for such heterogeneity: effective network size (ENS), which refers to the size of a maximally complete network (i.e., unstructured, where all individuals interact with all … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the standard epidemiological models can be effective and reliable only if (a) the social interactions are stationary through time (i.e., no changes in interventions or control measures), and (b) there exists a great deal of knowledge of class R with which to compute Equation (3). To acquire information on class R, several novel models included data from social media or call data records (CDR), which showed promising results [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. However, observation of the behavior of COVID-19 in several countries demonstrates a high degree of uncertainty and complexity [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the standard epidemiological models can be effective and reliable only if (a) the social interactions are stationary through time (i.e., no changes in interventions or control measures), and (b) there exists a great deal of knowledge of class R with which to compute Equation (3). To acquire information on class R, several novel models included data from social media or call data records (CDR), which showed promising results [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. However, observation of the behavior of COVID-19 in several countries demonstrates a high degree of uncertainty and complexity [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the class R can be computed precisely. To better estimate the class R, several data sources can be integrated with SIR-based models, e.g., social media and call data records (CDR), which of course a high degree of uncertainty and complexity still remains [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Considering the above uncertainties involved in the advancement of SIR-based models the generalization ability are yet to be improved to achieve scalable model with high performance [33].…”
Section: = − =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R 0 is the basic reproduction number used to quantify the transmission potential of a parasite, defined as the number of secondary infections caused by a single infected individual introduced into a population made up entirely of susceptible individuals. However, following the acknowledgment that individuals do not move or interact randomly, social networks have been integrated into these models during the last decade or so (Griffin and Nunn 2012;Huang and Li 2007;McCabe and Nunn 2018;Nunn 2009).…”
Section: Microbial Transmission Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expanding beyond homogenous populations that contain only susceptible individuals that interact randomly, recent studies have integrated network approaches with a classic set of individual-based models used in epidemiology that classify individuals or "agents" into moving between susceptible infected and resistant (or SIR) classes or compartments (Bansal et al 2007;Brauer 2008;Grimm and Railsback 2005;Kohler and Gumerman 2000). Such integrated network-based SIR models now form the basis of many epidemiological assessments in primate systems (Griffin and Nunn 2012;Kohler and Gumerman 2000;McCabe and Nunn, 2018;Rushmore et al 2014). For instance, the likelihood of parasite transmission from A to B may be a function of (1) whether A is already infected, (2) the likelihood of a link between A and B in their social network, and (3) the per-contact transmission probability "Beta."…”
Section: Microbial Transmission Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%