2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective marker placement for functional identification of the centre of rotation at the hip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the inter-individual differences were larger than the differences within a single subject - a result that is in agreement with results from studies on the knee joint [36]. Knowledge of the influence of STA when using skin markers is required to ensure compensation for the largest error sources [16], [52], [53].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the inter-individual differences were larger than the differences within a single subject - a result that is in agreement with results from studies on the knee joint [36]. Knowledge of the influence of STA when using skin markers is required to ensure compensation for the largest error sources [16], [52], [53].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It is, of course, entirely possible that these or other subject-specific factors contribute to the magnitude of STA on the back. Here, it is quite conceivable for example that the individual elastic properties of the soft tissues have a strong influence on the magnitude of STA; such observations have been reported at other regions of the body (thigh) by Kratzenstein and co-workers [52], who also demonstrated locally varying STA, which was mainly attributed to muscle contraction and skin elasticity. In addition, no relationship between the levels of STA and BMI were observed in our study, but this could also be an artefact of the low number of subjects in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The skin markers were either neglected completely (weight being 0, Figure 1(C)), or assigned weightings according to four different approaches: (I) only the bone markers ( Figure 2) were included and weighted manually with a factor of 1; (II) all markers were weighted manually with a factor of 1; (III) only the bone markers were included, and weighted automatically based on soft tissue artefacts (STA), and (IV) all markers were included, and weighted automatically based on STA. The STA automated weighting procedure was adapted from Heller et al (2011) and Kratzenstein et al (2012) using the relative variance of distance between each skin marker and the corresponding segment centre of mass. In order that each segment was considered with equal importance, the sum of all skin marker weighting factors was defined to be 10 on each segment, independent of the number of markers attached to that segment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Markers were also placed on the heel (posterior calcaneus), dorsal aspect of 5th metatarsal head and the dorsal aspect of 1st metatarsal head to define the foot. The participant performed a star movement to functionally determine hip joint centres, and knee flexion/extension to functionally determine knee axis 24,25 . For both the SKB and SKB Rot tests the aim was to perform prescribed movements, with the ability to do so graded against benchmark criteria.…”
Section: Motion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%