1976
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(76)90645-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective interaction of protons and neutrons in the subshells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

9
107
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
9
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). This result should not be affected by Coulomb effects as, for I Þ 0, Coulomb shifts are essentially constant in this model space [31]. However, this g ÿ2 9=2 interpretation of the 2 ÿ 8 energy difference could be altered when extended model spaces are considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…4). This result should not be affected by Coulomb effects as, for I Þ 0, Coulomb shifts are essentially constant in this model space [31]. However, this g ÿ2 9=2 interpretation of the 2 ÿ 8 energy difference could be altered when extended model spaces are considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The results of a shell-model calculation using the GrossFrenkel interaction [56] in a 1g 9/2 -2p 1/2 model space are shown to the right of Fig. 16.…”
Section: 43 Tc 43mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that in x-ray emitting binary systems, nuclei are synthesized via the rapid proton capture process (rp-process) [7] in which a sequence of proton captures and β decays is responsible for the burning of hydrogen into heavier elements. The rp-process proceeds through the exotic mass region with N ∼ Z above 56 Ni close to the proton dripline. Modern reaction network calculations [8] have suggested that the rp-process can extend up to the heavy Sn-Te mass region, involving nuclei of interest in the current study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of particle excitation from p 3/2 and f 5/2 orbitals were ignored. However, it was found that the calculated energies as reported by Gross and Frenkel [22] significantly differ from the experimental level energies at low spin. In the present work, the measured levels of 88 Zr have been compared with large scale shell model calculations based on the full unrestricted f 5/2 pg 9/2 model space with newly developed JUN45 [15] and jj44b [16] interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This suggests significant contribution from two neutron holes at g 9/2 orbitals in the excited states of both nuclei. Previous shell model calculations reported for this nucleus were mostly carried out using 88 Sr core having only p 1/2 and g 9/2 orbitals available for excitation with two neutron holes and two proton particles [22,23]. The effect of particle excitation from p 3/2 and f 5/2 orbitals were ignored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%