2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10708-008-9229-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective intellectual property protection of traditional knowledge of plants and their uses: an example from Australia

Abstract: Intellectual property rights (IPR) to traditional knowledge (TK) about Australian native plants could justifiably be described as a birthright of Australian Aboriginal people. However, as is generally the case throughout the world, this right is currently not protected under Australian law. A case study is presented describing the approach that was taken to protecting the plant knowledge rights of traditional knowledge (TK) holders who participated in research at Titjikala, central Australia. From a review of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recognize that both the concept of IEK and approaches to integration are highly contested. Scientists call for greater efforts in the definition and validation of the integrity of IEK knowledge claims, and some Indigenous groups have also sought validation of their IEK knowledge claims by science (Evans et al 2009, Gratani et al 2011. Other Indigenous people resist scientific efforts to integrate with IEK as a result of concerns that power relations embedded in IEK projects will further marginalize their interests (Smith 1999, Agrawal 2002, Davis and Ruddle 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We recognize that both the concept of IEK and approaches to integration are highly contested. Scientists call for greater efforts in the definition and validation of the integrity of IEK knowledge claims, and some Indigenous groups have also sought validation of their IEK knowledge claims by science (Evans et al 2009, Gratani et al 2011. Other Indigenous people resist scientific efforts to integrate with IEK as a result of concerns that power relations embedded in IEK projects will further marginalize their interests (Smith 1999, Agrawal 2002, Davis and Ruddle 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACoG and AG types typically maintain the distinction between IEK and western science, through separate documentation initiatives, and clearly specified interactions, such as "validation" of IEK by science (Evans et al 2009). …”
Section: Manifestations Of Iek and Western Science Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we introduce the papers in two broad themes. Four of the Australian papers (Cunningham et al 2009;Evans et al 2009;Moran and Elvin 2009;Singleton et al 2009) together with Tougiani et al's paper from Niger are concerned with efforts to reduce poverty and disadvantage by engaging local knowledge and resources equitably, and by promoting institutional change. The other group of four papers are concerned with understanding the diverse knowledge systems of desert people (Clark and Brake 2009;Maclean 2009; VaarzonMorel and Gabrys 2009), or tourists (Hueneke and Baker 2009), in order to promote collaborative management of the multi-functional desert landscapes of Australia.…”
Section: The 'Desert Knowledge Movement'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the Australian papers in this issue (Evans et al 2009;Singleton et al 2009) derive from DKCRC projects whose main emphasis has been to understand how best to support enterprise development amongst Aboriginal people and more effective engagement with markets. The projects have looked for the commercial advantage that Aboriginal people may have from factors such as their remote location, ecological knowledge and distinctive cultures.…”
Section: New Livelihood Strategies In Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation