2019 International Radar Conference (RADAR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/radar41533.2019.171322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Ground-Truthing of Supervised Machine Learning for Drone Classification

Abstract: It has already been shown that multibeam staring radar is able to detect and track low observable targets such as drones due to its high sensitivity [1]. Due to this level of sensitivity, targets that have a similar RCS to drones are also detected and tracked. These are predominantly birds. Birds and drones are similar in several ways such as flight altitude, velocity and manoeuvrability [2] such that discrimination between them is challenging. Hence, there is a need to look for high performing methods of clas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Live radar trials with controlled targets form an important element of characterising radar performance, benchmarking system capabilities and collection of accurately truthed data to aid the development of machine learning classifiers ( [6,7]). Several small drones have been acquired that are routinely flown for data collection with control test targets.…”
Section: Field Trials Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Live radar trials with controlled targets form an important element of characterising radar performance, benchmarking system capabilities and collection of accurately truthed data to aid the development of machine learning classifiers ( [6,7]). Several small drones have been acquired that are routinely flown for data collection with control test targets.…”
Section: Field Trials Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional ML classifiers that have been employed for micro-Doppler-based classification include linear and non-linear Support Vector Machines (SVM) [28,32,33,48,49], naïve Bayes [49,50], Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) [7], subspace reliability analysis [51], discriminant analysis [52], and decision trees [19,53]. These classifiers have achieved good results with classification accuracies of 90% and above on their acquired datasets under different experimental scenarios.…”
Section: Conventional ML Classification Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of the spectrum data extraction, target location information is taken from the tracker output of the Gamekeeper 16U system. As detailed in [31], ground truth data is used to label the output tracks.…”
Section: Data Collection Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%