2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6544/ac15ac
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective estimates of Lyapunov exponents for random products of positive matrices

Abstract: In this note we describe estimates on the error when calculating the Lyaponov exponent for random products of positive matrices using dynamical determinants. This extends the results in (Jurga N and Morris I 2019 Nonlinearity 32 4117–46; Pollicott M 2010 Invent. Math. 181 209–26) by drawing upon a new approach introduced in (Jenkinson O and Pollicott M 2018 Adv. Math. 325 87–115; Jenkinson O, Pollicott M and Vytnova P 2018 J. Stat. Phys. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To summarize, our upper bounds are sometimes better, sometimes not, compared to those of [10] and [22]. At the same time, our combinatorial method is much simpler than analytical methods of [10], [19], and [22].…”
Section: For Pollicott's Matricesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To summarize, our upper bounds are sometimes better, sometimes not, compared to those of [10] and [22]. At the same time, our combinatorial method is much simpler than analytical methods of [10], [19], and [22].…”
Section: For Pollicott's Matricesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This gives an easily computable upper bound on λ. We note that in [19] and [22], upper and lower bounds on λ were obtained using altogether different techniques, with [22] specifically addressing the case where A = A(k), B = B(m) (in the notation of our Section 2.1).…”
Section: Somewhat Less Obviously Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation