2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective DNA binding protein prediction by using key features via Chou’s general PseAAC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, in order to further verify our model, we used independent test samples in literatures [14,16,17,19] to test our model. Four methods are used to estimate the performance of our method, including Accuracy, Recall, Specificity, and MCC (Mathew’s correlation coefficient).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, in order to further verify our model, we used independent test samples in literatures [14,16,17,19] to test our model. Four methods are used to estimate the performance of our method, including Accuracy, Recall, Specificity, and MCC (Mathew’s correlation coefficient).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adilinaet al improved the method for extracting sequence features by adopting grouping and recurrent selection to process the obtained feature sets. Their approach reduced the overfitting degree of the model [19]. With the development of network technology, some web implementations for discriminating DNA-binding proteins have been created that can provide online predictive services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 lists the results of comparison between our method and other methods. PseDNA-Pro [26], IDNA-Prot|dis [29], IDNA-Prot [43], DNAbinder [27], DNA-Prot [44], iDNAPro-PseAAC [45], Local-DPP [30], Adilina’s work [46] and Kmer1+ACC [47] are benchmark methods. And IDNA-Prot|dis (MCC: 0.54), PseDNA-Pro (MCC: 0.53) iDNAPro-PseAAC (MCC: 0.53) and Local-DPP (MCC: 0.59) obtain better performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing SVM-based predictive methods differ in encoding schemes for protein sequences. A great number of sequence features have been applied to represent protein sequences into fixed-length numeric vectors, such as amino acid composition (AAC) [17], dipeptide composition [18], pseudo-AAC [19][20][21][22], position-specific score matrix (PSSM) profile [23][24][25][26][27], predicted secondary structure [28], and hidden Markov model (HMM) profile [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%